We apologize for a recent technical issue with our email system, which temporarily affected account activations. Accounts have now been activated. Authors may proceed with paper submissions. PhDFocusTM
CFP last date
20 November 2024
Reseach Article

Performance Analysis of Different Classifiers used in Detecting Benign and Malignant Cells of Breast Cancer

by Taskin Noor Turna, Mst. Alema Khatun
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 183 - Number 27
Year of Publication: 2021
Authors: Taskin Noor Turna, Mst. Alema Khatun
10.5120/ijca2021921661

Taskin Noor Turna, Mst. Alema Khatun . Performance Analysis of Different Classifiers used in Detecting Benign and Malignant Cells of Breast Cancer. International Journal of Computer Applications. 183, 27 ( Sep 2021), 44-48. DOI=10.5120/ijca2021921661

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2021921661,
author = { Taskin Noor Turna, Mst. Alema Khatun },
title = { Performance Analysis of Different Classifiers used in Detecting Benign and Malignant Cells of Breast Cancer },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Sep 2021 },
volume = { 183 },
number = { 27 },
month = { Sep },
year = { 2021 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 44-48 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume183/number27/32102-2021921661/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2021921661 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:18:06.053068+05:30
%A Taskin Noor Turna
%A Mst. Alema Khatun
%T Performance Analysis of Different Classifiers used in Detecting Benign and Malignant Cells of Breast Cancer
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 183
%N 27
%P 44-48
%D 2021
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common disease now a days. To get an early detection the target is to find an efficient way to use scientific investigation, because early detection is the only way to remove cancer cell. To predict the accuracy of breast cancer detection, researchers have used different classification techniques. In this paper random forest, Support vector machine, XGBoost, Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes and AdaBoost have been used to analyze and compare the performance. A comparative study is done on these five classifiers using different accuracy measurements like performance, accuracy rate. This study shows that XGBoost gives the high performance among others.

References
  1. Breast Cancer Definition: https://www.longdom.org/ (accessed 16.06.21).
  2. Breast Cancer Statistics: https://www.thefinancialexpress.com.bd/health/breast-cancer-takes-6844-lives-in-bangladesh-every-year-1570707616/ (accessed 17.06.21).
  3. Breast Cancer Statistics: https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/breast-cancer-statistics/ (accessed 18.06.21).
  4. S.H. Nrea, Y.G. Gezahegn, A.S. Boltena, G. Hagos, Breast cancer detection using convolutional neural networks, In: Workshop paper at AI4AH, ICLR (2020).
  5. N. Khuriwal, N. Mishra, Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Deep Learning Algorithm. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (2018) 98-103.
  6. Maheshwar, G. Kumar, Breast Cancer Detection Using Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, KNN and SVM Classifiers: A Comparative Study. In: 2nd International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology, 683-686 (2019).
  7. Gupta, S., Kumar, D., Sharma, A.: Data Mining Classification Techniques Applied For Breast Cancer Diagnosis And Prognosis. Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering 2(2), (2011) 188-195.
  8. L.G. Ahmad, A.T. Eshlaghy, A. Poorebrahimi, M. Ebrahimi, A.R. Razavi, Using Three Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence. Journal of Health & Medical Informatics 4(2), (2013).
  9. R. Rouhi, M. Jafari, S. Kasaei, P. Keshavarzian, Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors Classification Based On Region Growing and CNN Segmentation. Expert Systems with Application xxx (2014) xxx-xxx, 1-13.
  10. J. Koay, C. Herry, M. Frize, Analysis of Breast Thermography with an Artificial Neural Network. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS San Francisco, CA, USA, (2004) 1159-1162.
  11. W.N. Street, W.H. Wolberg, O.L. Mangasarian, Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis. In: International Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology, San Jose, CA, vol. 1905, (1993) 861-870.
  12. O.L. Mangasarian, W.N. Street, W.H. Wolberg, Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear programming. Operations Research 43(4), (1995) 570-577.
  13. W.H. Wolberg, W.N. Street, O.L. Mangasarian, Machine learning techniques to diagnose breast cancer from fine-needle aspirates. Cancer Letters 77 (1994).
  14. Label encoding:www.geeksforgeeks.org/ (accessed 24.06.21).
  15. Random forest classification: https://towardsdatascience.com/random-forest-classification-and-its-implementation-d5d840dbead0/ (accessed 25.06.21).
  16. Support vector machine classifier: https://www.javatpoint.com/machine-learning-support-vector-machine-algorithm?fbclid=IwAR3iZFe32lumxzUcnwTJZU_xXErtLI2Nd_p6JC9y5otqJcLk_k-1iIxR_-0/(accessed 26.06.21).
  17. Support Vector Machines Soft Margin Formulation and Kernel Trick: https://towardsdatascience.com/support-vector-machines-soft-margin-formulation-and-kernel-trick-4c9729dc8efe/ (accessed 27.06.21).
  18. XGBoost Classifier: https://towardsdatascience.com/a-beginners-guide-to-xgboost-87f5d4c30ed7/ (accessed 28.06.21).
  19. Decision tree classification algorithm: http://www.javapoint.com (accessed 30.06.21).
  20. Naïve Bayes Classifier: www.GeeksforGeeks.org (accessed 09.07. 21).
  21. AdaBoost Classifier: www.Scikit-learn.org (accessed 10.7.21)
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

SVM XGBoost performance classification breast cancer