CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Computational Modeling and Assessment of Acceptance Level of Virtual Learning Platforms

by William Akotam Agangiba, Millicent Agangiba, George Essah Yaw Okai
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 184 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2022
Authors: William Akotam Agangiba, Millicent Agangiba, George Essah Yaw Okai
10.5120/ijca2022922108

William Akotam Agangiba, Millicent Agangiba, George Essah Yaw Okai . Computational Modeling and Assessment of Acceptance Level of Virtual Learning Platforms. International Journal of Computer Applications. 184, 12 ( May 2022), 49-54. DOI=10.5120/ijca2022922108

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2022922108,
author = { William Akotam Agangiba, Millicent Agangiba, George Essah Yaw Okai },
title = { Computational Modeling and Assessment of Acceptance Level of Virtual Learning Platforms },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2022 },
volume = { 184 },
number = { 12 },
month = { May },
year = { 2022 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 49-54 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume184/number12/32380-2022922108/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2022922108 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:21:19.269727+05:30
%A William Akotam Agangiba
%A Millicent Agangiba
%A George Essah Yaw Okai
%T Computational Modeling and Assessment of Acceptance Level of Virtual Learning Platforms
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 184
%N 12
%P 49-54
%D 2022
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

One common challenge that comes with postgraduate studies is the fact that students usually have to combine studies with family, job and other personal and professional endeavours. Despite these challenges, the number of postgraduate students has seen massive increase in recent times as a result of job competitiveness and the need for knowledge creation. To cope with the large numbers in postgraduate supervision and to provide flexibility for the working class to acquire higher degrees, online postgraduate supervision has become common. However, research shows that several challenges confront virtual supervision for both the supervisor and the supervisee which include the feeling of isolation and attrition. This paper examines the challenges associated with technologies such as Virtual Learning Platforms (VLPs) for postgraduate supervision and proposes a computational technique for assessing key attributes of VLPs. A survey among 160 postgraduate students shows that students combine a variety of VLPs for communicating with their supervisors for reasons such as cost-effectiveness, technical-know-how and availability of means. The results reveal amalgamated factors that influence the choice of technologies used by supervisors and students. The findings further indicate that user-friendliness, attractiveness, transparency, interactivity and support are reasons why postgraduate students in Ghana mostly prefer social media platforms such as WhatsApp in interacting with their supervisors.

References
  1. A. Martin, “Supervising Doctorates at a Distance: Three Trans-Tasman Stories”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 20, Issue 1, 2012.
  2. J. Rodwell, R. Neumann, “Predictors of timely doctoral student completions by type of attendance: the utility of a pragmatic approach”, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 30, Issue 1, 2008.
  3. G. Basilaia, D. Kvavadze, “TransitiontoOnlineEducationinSchoolsduringaSARS-CoV- 2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia”, Pedagogical Research, Vol.5, Issue 4l, 2020.
  4. M. Beer, R.B. Mason, “Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 46, Issue 2, 2009.
  5. D. U. Bolliger, F. A. Inan, “Development and validation of the online student connectedness survey (OSCS)”, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,Vol. 13, Issue 3, 2012.
  6. E. Breitenbach, “Evaluating a model to increase doctorate program completion rates: A focus on social connectedness and structure”, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, Vol. 14, Issue 1, 2019.
  7. E. V. Cano, M. Luisa, S. García, “ICT Strategies and Tools for the Improvement of Instructional Supervision”, The Virtual Supervision, Vol. 12, Issue 1, 2013.
  8. M. A. Carter, (2013), “A study of students’ perceptions of the online component of a hybrid postgraduate course”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 84, 2013.
  9. C. Coman, L. G. Țîru, L. Meseșan-Schmitz, C. Stanciu, M. C. Bularca, “Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic:students’perspective”, Sustainability, Vol. 12, Issue 24, 2020.
  10. A. Chin, M. P. Couper, D. Beckett, “Attrition in a Longitudinal Online Randomized Controlled Trial withProspectiveHomeowners”,Field Methods, Vol. 33, Issue 1, 2021.
  11. A. Deshpande, “A Qualitative Examination of ChallengesInfluencingDoctoral Students in an Online Doctoral Program”, International EducationStudies, Vol. 9, Issue 6, 2016.
  12. C. Rapanta, L. Botturi, P. Goodyear, L. Guàrdia, M. Koole,“Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity”, Postdigital Science and Education, Vol. 2, Issue 3, 2020.
  13. L. Ford, G. Branch, G. Moore, “Formation of a virtual professional learning community in a combined local and distance doctoral cohort”, AACE Journal, Vol 16 Issue 2, 2008.
  14. A. Gordillo, E. Barra, S. Aguirre, J. Quemada, “The usefulness of usability and user experience evaluation methods on an e-Learning platform development from a developer's perspective: A case study”, In Proceedings of IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Madrid, pp. 1-8, 2014.
  15. M. T. Gumbo, “University of South Africa Supervisors' Knowledge of Technological Tools and ICTs for Postgraduate Supervision”, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET, Vol. 17, Vol. 4, 2018
  16. A. J. Rockinson-Szapkiw, L. Heuvelman-Hutchinson, L. Spaulding, “Connecting Online: Can Social Networking and Other Technology Support Doctoral Connectedness?”, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, Vol. 11, Issue 3, 2014.
  17. H. E. Kentnor, “Distance education and the evolution of online learning in the United States”, Curriculum and teaching dialogue, Vol. 17, Issue 1, 2015.
  18. S.Iftakhar, “Google classroom: what works and how”, Journal of Education and Social Sciences, Vol. 3, Issue 1, 2016.
  19. K. W. Lai, “Digital technology and the culture of teaching and learning in higher education”,Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 27, Issue 8, 2011.
  20. B. Lovitts and C. Nelson, “The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph.D. Programs”, Academe, Vol. 86, Issue 6, 2000
  21. C.Manathunga, “Early warning signs in postgraduate research education: A different approach to ensuring timely completions”, Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 10, Issue 2, 2005.
  22. D. Maor, J. K. Currie (2017), “The use of technology in postgraduate supervision pedagogy in two Australian universities”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, Vol. 14, Issue 1, 2017.
  23. M. L. E. Mapesela, A. C. Wilkinson, “The pains and gains of supervising postgraduate students from a distance: The case of six students from Lesotho”. South African Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 19, Issue 1, 2005
  24. T.Karakose, “Emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19 pandemic and potential risks for socioeconomically disadvantaged students in higher education”, Educational Process: International Journal, Vol. 10, Issue 3, 2021.
  25. F. Nasiri, F. Mafakheri, “Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: A review of challenges and strategies”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 40, Issue 10, 2015.
  26. R. Neumann, J. Rodwell, “The invisible part‐time research students: a case study of satisfaction and completion”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 34, Issue 1, 2009.
  27. Q. N. Nkohkwo, M. S. Islam, “Challenges to the Successful Implementation of e-Government Initiatives in Sub-Saharan Africa : A Literature Review”, Electronic Journal of e-Government. Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2013.
  28. B. Olivier, M. Verdonck, D. Caseleijn, “Digital technologies in undergraduate and postgraduate education in occupational therapy and physiotherapy: a scoping review”, JBI Evidence Synthesis, Vol. 18, Issue 5, 2020.
  29. S, Palvia, P. Aeron, P. Gupta, D. Mahapatra, R Parida, R. Rosner, S. Sindhi, S., “Online education: Worldwide status, challenges, trends, and implications”, Journal of Global Information Technology Management,Vol. 21, Issue 4, 2018
  30. P. Rambe, M. Mkono, “Appropriating WhatsApp‐mediated postgraduate supervision to negotiate “relational authenticity” in resource‐constrained environments”,British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 2, 2019.
  31. P. J. Slagter van Tryon, M. J. Bishop, “Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments”, Distance Education, Vol. 30, Issue 3, 2009
  32. J. Rodwell, R. Neumann, “Predictors of timely doctoral student completions by type of attendance: the utility of a pragmatic approach”, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 30, Issue 1, 2008.
  33. E. A. Roumell, D. U. Bolliger, “Experiences of faculty with doctoral student supervision in programs delivered via distance”, The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, Vol. 65, Issue 2, 2017.
  34. C. Stone, M. Springer, M. “Interactivity, connectedness and teacher-presence: Engaging and retaining students online”, Australian Journal of Adult Learning, Vol. 59, Issue 2, 2019.
  35. S. R. Terrell, M. M. Snyder, L. P. Dringus, E. Maddrey, E., “A grounded theory of connectivityand persistence in a limited residency doctoral program”, Qualitative Report, Vol. 17, Issue 62, 2012.
  36. J. H. Watts, “Teaching in Higher Education Challenges of supervising part-time PhD students : towards student-centred practice”, Teaching in Higher Education Vol. 13, Issue 3, 2008.
  37. C. M. Hoskins, A. D, Goldberg, “Doctoral student persistence in counsellor education programs: Student-program match”, Counsellor Education & Supervision, Vol. 44, No. 3
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Virtual Learning social media Internet Technology Postgraduate supervision Online Learning

Powered by PhDFocusTM