CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Risk Management Analysis of Student Activity System Services using COBIT 5 Framework

by Mega Oktaviani Fadillah, Imam Riadi
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 184 - Number 25
Year of Publication: 2022
Authors: Mega Oktaviani Fadillah, Imam Riadi
10.5120/ijca2022922298

Mega Oktaviani Fadillah, Imam Riadi . Risk Management Analysis of Student Activity System Services using COBIT 5 Framework. International Journal of Computer Applications. 184, 25 ( Aug 2022), 1-9. DOI=10.5120/ijca2022922298

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2022922298,
author = { Mega Oktaviani Fadillah, Imam Riadi },
title = { Risk Management Analysis of Student Activity System Services using COBIT 5 Framework },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Aug 2022 },
volume = { 184 },
number = { 25 },
month = { Aug },
year = { 2022 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-9 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume184/number25/32465-2022922298/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2022922298 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:22:21.101143+05:30
%A Mega Oktaviani Fadillah
%A Imam Riadi
%T Risk Management Analysis of Student Activity System Services using COBIT 5 Framework
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 184
%N 25
%P 1-9
%D 2022
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

The development of Information Technology (IT) plays an important role in the company's operations and business processes. IT has an important role in the continuity of business operations and contributes significantly to various fundamental changes to the organization’s structure, operations, and management. Ahmad Dahlan University Yogyakarta is a university in Indonesia that has implemented an information system for services. The Student Activity Information System (SKK) is one of the information systems that has long been implemented by BIMAWA (Student and Alumni Bureau) to provide services for students who will take care of SKPI (Certificate of Diploma Companion). In its business processes, this service still has various risks from information system infrastructure, even from humans and nature. The COBIT 5 framework with the APO12 (Manage Risk) domain was used in this study to analyze risk management on such services. There are three stages of analysis in the research conducted, namely Current Capability Level analysis, Expected Capability Level analysis, and GAP analysis. The Capability Level assessment is carried out by collecting data using observation methods, interviews in person, and questionnaires that will be calculated using the Guttman Scale. The results showed that the Current Capability Level value for the APO12 (Manage Risk) domain was 2.60, which means that the risk management of SKK Services is at level 2 (Managed Process). The Expected Capability Level targeted by BIMAWA is at level 3, so the gap value obtained is 0.40.Recommendations are given to be used as guidelines in implementing SKK Services in BIMAWA.

References
  1. Amrulloh, A., Wibisono, G., Rakhmadi, A., & Key, K. (2020). Audit of Information Technology Governance in Universities Using Cobit 5 Focus of Preliminary Process of Research Methodology. 19(1), 115–120.
  2. Setyaningrum, N. D., Suprapto, & Kusyanti, A. (2018). Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using the COBIT 5 Framework (Case Study: PT . Kimia Farma (Persero) Tbk – Plant Watudakon). Journal of Information Technology Development And Computer Science, 2(1), 143–152. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/731.
  3. Aziz, R. A., Kusrini, & Sudarmawan. (2018). Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management in STATE-OWNED Companies Using THE COBIT 5 Standard (Case Study: PT TASPEN PERSERO). CIDA IT Journal, 4(2), 1–11. http://journal.amikomsolo.ac.id/index.php/itcida/article/view/80.
  4. Nurhidayat, R., & Handayaningsih, S. (2019). Risk Management Analysis On Student Resignation Services Using the COBIT 5 Framework Focus on Manage Risk (APO12). JSTIE (Journal of Bachelor of Informatics Engineering) (E-Journal), 7(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.12928/jstie.v7i1.15806.
  5. Maiyana, E., & Mengkasarinal, T. (2018). Implementation of Online Application for Certificate of Diploma Companion. Tower of Science, XII(79), 31–40. http://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/menarailmu/article/viewFile/508/447
  6. Sa'diyah, U., & Manuputty, A. D. (2018). Salatiga City Government E-Government governance analysis using the COBIT 5 Domain APO Framework. National Seminar on Information and Communication Technology, 2018(Sentika), 147–155. https://fti.uajy.ac.id/sentika/publikasi/makalah/2018/18.pdf.
  7. Arief, M. H., & Suprapto. (2018). Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using the COBIT 5 Framework (Case Study on Perum Jasa Tirta I Malang). Journal of Information Technology Development And Computer Science, 2(1), 101–110. http://repository.ub.ac.id/1480/.
  8. Agtika, A. S., Mursityo, Y. T., & Rachmadi, A. (2019). Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management at the Planning, Research and Development Agency (Barenlitbang) of Malang City Using COBIT 5 Domains EDM03 and APO12. Journal of Information Technology Development And Computer Science, 3(5), 4218–4225. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/5169.
  9. Putri, L. D. M., Perdanakusuma, A. R., & Rachmadi, A. (2019). Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Maturity Using the COBIT 5 Process Assessment Model (Case Study of PT . XYZ New Zealand). Journal of Information Technology Development And Computer Science, 3(6), 6089–6098. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/download/5647/2673.
  10. Zakkadiaksa, I., Hanggara, B. T., & Prakoso, B. S. (2020). Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using COBIT 5 with Domains EDM03 and APO12 (Case Study on UPT-ICT Universitas Brawijaya). Journal of Information Technology Development And Computer Science, 4(8), 2329–2337. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/7621.
  11. Butarbutar, N., & Tanaamah, A. R. (2021). Risk Management Analysis Using COBIT 5 Domain APO12 (Case Study: Yayasan Bina Darma). Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 3(3), 352–362. http://www.journal-isi.org/index.php/isi/article/view/155.
  12. Indriyanto, & Riadi, I. (2021). Analysis of Risk Assessment on Student Credit Services using COBIT 5 Framework. International Journal of Computer Applications, 183(23), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2021921826.
  13. Simatupang, E., Assegaf, S., & B, M. R. P. (2020). Governance of Information Technology Utilization Using COBIT at SMPN 18 Jambi City. Scientific Journal of Information Systems Students, 2(1), 89–102. http://ejournal.stikom-db.ac.id/index.php/jimsi/article/view/800.
  14. Fahri Husaini, Awalludiyah Ambarwati, L. J. (2019). IT Asset Risk Analysis Using octave method on SWD Resto. National Seminar on Information Systems, 3(1), 1940–1946. https://jurnalfti.unmer.ac.id/index.php/senasif/article/view/258.
  15. Thenu, P. P., Wijaya, A. F., & Rudianto, C. (2020). Information Technology Risk Management Analysis Using Cobit 5 (Case Study: Pt Global Infotech). Journal of Computer Development, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33557/binakomputer.v2i1.799.
  16. Rahmania, N. M., Suprapto, & Perdanakusuma, A. R. (2018). Assessment of Information Technology Risk Management Capabilities Using the COBIT 5 Framework (Case Study: Operational Area (DAOP) XX). Journal of Information Technology Development And Computer Science, 2(12), 6828–6836. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/3764.
  17. Ichwani, A., & Farida, A. D. (2020). Measurement of The Level of Risk Management Capability of Sharia Cooperative Information System Using COBIT Framework 5. Journal of Computing, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.23960/komputasi.v8i1.2528.
  18. Darmawan, A. K., & Dwiharto, A. (2019). Capability Level Measurement of E-Government Service Quality in Pamekasan Regency Using the COBIT 5.0 Framework. INTENSIVE: Scientific Journal of Research and Application of Information Systems Technology, 3(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.29407/intensif.v3i2.12659.
  19. ISACA. (2012a). COBIT 5: A Business Framework for The Governance and Management of Enterprise IT COBIT 5. In ISACA (Vol. 34, Issue 1). ISACA. http://tp.revistas.csic.es/index.php/tp/article/viewArticle/432%0Ahttp://files/399/432.html.
  20. ISACA. (2012c). COBIT 5: Implementation. In ISACA. ISACA. http://www.isaca.org/COBIT/Pages/COBIT-5-spanish.aspx.
  21. ISACA. (2012b). COBIT 5: Enabling Processes. ISACA. https://community.mis.temple.edu/mis5203sec003spring2020/files/2019/01/COBIT5-Ver2-enabling.pdf.
  22. Purwanto, A., & Riadi, I. (2021). Analysis of Risk Management Assessment on Customer Services using COBIT 5 Framework. International Journal of Computer Applications, 183(29), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2022921996.
  23. Tamara, A. F., & Riadi, I. (2021). Analysis of Risk Assessment on Student Credit Services using COBIT 5 Framework. International Journal of Computer Applications, 183(42), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2021921826
  24. Noveryal, N., & Dahlan, A. (2022). Analysis of a Maturity of Case Search Information Systems using Cobit 5 Framework. 184(12), 29–35.
  25. Bhaskoro, S. F., & Riadi, I. (2022). Analysis of Risk Assessment on Attendance Information Systems using COBIT 5 Framework. International Journal of Computer Applications, 184(7), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2022922030.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Information Systems Services Risk Management COBIT 5 APO12 Capability Level Guttman Scale

Powered by PhDFocusTM