CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Analysis of Risk Assessment on Attendance Information Systems using COBIT 5 Framework

by Siddiq Fajar Bhaskoro, Imam Riadi
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 184 - Number 7
Year of Publication: 2022
Authors: Siddiq Fajar Bhaskoro, Imam Riadi
10.5120/ijca2022922030

Siddiq Fajar Bhaskoro, Imam Riadi . Analysis of Risk Assessment on Attendance Information Systems using COBIT 5 Framework. International Journal of Computer Applications. 184, 7 ( Apr 2022), 16-24. DOI=10.5120/ijca2022922030

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2022922030,
author = { Siddiq Fajar Bhaskoro, Imam Riadi },
title = { Analysis of Risk Assessment on Attendance Information Systems using COBIT 5 Framework },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Apr 2022 },
volume = { 184 },
number = { 7 },
month = { Apr },
year = { 2022 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 16-24 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume184/number7/32340-2022922030/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2022922030 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:20:51.193206+05:30
%A Siddiq Fajar Bhaskoro
%A Imam Riadi
%T Analysis of Risk Assessment on Attendance Information Systems using COBIT 5 Framework
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 184
%N 7
%P 16-24
%D 2022
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

TVRI Yogyakarta has implemented digitalized information technology in achieving its organizational goals. To support its business processes, TVRI Yogyakarta uses an E-Presence Work Service Application which is used to manage the recording of employee attendance data so that employee attendance data can be identified automatically through the system and stored in the system database, but several risks occur such as data storage that is not recorded. properly so that it causes data loss and disrupted internet connections that affect the running of ongoing system processes. This research was conducted according to the COBIT 5 risk assessment guideline which focuses on two domains APO12 (Managing Risk) consisting of APO12.01 to APO12.06 and EDM03 (Ensuring Risk Optimization) consisting of EDM03.01 to EDM03.02. The assessment of the capability level used in the process assessment is done by collecting observation data, interviews, and questionnaires and then analyzing it with the Process Assessment Model so that it can find out the current capability value, expected capability value, gap and determine recommendations for each risk. Based on the results of testing the Capability Level in the APO12 (Managing Risk) domain, it is obtained a value of 3.67 which indicates the implementation of the process is at level 4 (Predictable Process) and EDM03 (Ensuring Risk Optimization) obtained a value of 3 which indicates the implementation of the process is at level 3 (Established). Process). The results of the gap based on calculations carried out by the APO12 process (Managing Risk) found a gap of 0.33 and EDM03 (Ensuring Risk Optimization) it was found that a gap of 1 ha was used as a recommendation. This research has been carried out well following the expected research objectives.

References
  1. MP Wibawa and AD Manuputty. (2020). “Information Technology Risk Management Analysis Policy Service PT. Sinar Mas Insurance Using COBIT Framework 5, " JATISI (Journal of Information Technology and Information System), vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 466–479.
  2. N. Dwi Setyaningrum, Suprapto, and A. Kusyanti. (2018). “Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using COBIT 5 Framework (Case Study: PT. Kimia Farma (Persero) Tbk-Plant Watudakon),” J Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. and Computer Science., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 143–152.
  3. NL Khoiriyah, F. Marisa, and ID Wijaya. (2018). “Designing an Online Presence System Based on Granted Data Validity,” JIMP - J. Inform. Merdeka Pasuruan, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53–61.
  4. AF Tamara and I. Riadi. (2021). “Analysis of Risk Assessment on Student Credit Services using COBIT 5 Framework,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 183, no. 42, pp. 50–58.
  5. M. Megawati and A. Syntia. (2018). “Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using Cobit 5.0 Framework,” J. Ilm. Engineering and Management. Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 118.
  6. RDA Putra, A. Ambarwati, and E. Setiawan. (2019). "Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Based on COBIT 5 Framework at PT.BTM," JSI J. Sist. Inf., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1754–1762.
  7. CU Putri. (2017). “Information Technology Process Risk Assessment Based on Cobit 5 Framework at the Helpdesk of the Subdirectory of Information Technology Services and Systems Directorate of Information Technology and Systems Development (DPTSI) Institute of Technology Sepuluh Nopember,” Thesis, p. 241.
  8. HM Astuti, FA Muqtadiroh, EWT Darmaningrat, and CU Putri. (2017). “Risks Assessment of Information Technology Processes Based on COBIT 5 Framework: A Case Study of ITS Service Desk,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 124, pp. 569–576.
  9. AK Darmawan and A. Dwiharto. (2019). "Measuring the Capability Level of E-Government Service Quality of Pamekasan Regency Using COBIT 5.0 Framework," INTENSIFY J. Ilm. Panelist. and Application of Technology. Sist. Inf., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 93.
  10. RA Aziz, Kusrini, and Sudarmawan. (2018). "Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management in State-Owned Enterprises Using COBIT Standard 5 (Case Study: PT TASPEN PERSERO)," J. IT CIDA, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–11.
  11. NZ Firdaus and Suprapto. (2018) “Evaluation of Information Technology Risk Management Using COBIT 5 IT Risk (Case Study: PT. Petrokimia Gresik),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. and Computer Science., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10.
  12. YP Andriani and I. Riadi. (2021). “Risk Assessment of Monitoring Services using COBIT 5 Framework,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 183, no. 37, pp. 8–16.
  13. H. Fryonanda, H. Sokoco, and Y. Nurhadryani. (2019 ). “Evaluation of Information Technology Infrastructure with Cobit 5 and Itil V3,” JUTI J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 1.
  14. TS Agoan, HF Wowor, and S. Karouw. (2017). “Analysis of Information Technology Maturity Level in Manado City Communication and Informatics Department Using COBIT Framework 5 Domain Evaluate, Direct, Monitor (EDM) and Deliver, Service, and Support (DSS), ” J. Tech. Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–9.
  15. T. Kristanto, L. Andri Lestari, J. Informatics Engineering, I. Technology Adhi Tama Surabaya, and J. Arief Rachman Hakim. (2016). “Analysis of E-government Maturity Level Using COBIT Framework 5 (Study Case of the Department of Trade and Industry of the City of Surabaya), ” Semin. Nas. Sist. Inf. Indonesia., vol. 5, no. November 2016.
  16. M. Asqia and P. Prihandoko. (2018). "Analysis of the Maturity Level of Ti Governance in Academic Information Systems Using Cobit 5," J. Teknol. Integrated, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 101–116.
  17. P. Studi, S. Systems, FT Information, JON No, and K. Salatiga. (2018). “Analysis of Office Information Technology Governance,” no. November, pp. 3–8.
  18. A. Pasquini and E. Galiè. (2013). “COBIT 5 and the Process Capability Model. Improvements Provided for IT Governance Process, ” Fikusz 13, pp. 1–10.
  19. US Attendance, UC Diagram, S. Diagram, and C. Diagram. (2014). “Application of Employee Attendance System Using Barcode Method in PT. XYZ, ” J. Sist. Inf. Univ. Suryadarma, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 55–77.
  20. N. Farikhah, R. Fauzi, and F. Dewi. (2021). “ANALYSIS OF RISK MANAGEMENT FROM USING SEVEN ENABLERS BASED ON COBIT 5 FOR RISK (Case Study: PT. ABC),” J. Sci. Soc. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, p. 236.
  21. A. Wiraniagara and AF Wijaya. (2019). “Information Technology Governance Analysis Using Cobit Framework 5 Domain Deliver Support and Service (Case Study: Eka Tjipta Foundation),” Sebatik, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 663–671.
  22. S. Zhang and H. Le Fever. (2013). “An Examination of the Practicability of COBIT Framework and the Proposal of a COBIT-BSC Model,” J. Econ. Bus. Manag., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 391–395.
  23. HM Kurnia, RN Shofa, and R. Rianto. (2019). “Information Technology Governance Audit Using COBIT 5 Framework Based on APO12 Domain,” J. SITECH Sist. Inf. and Teknol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 99–106.
  24. J. Media and I. Budidarma. (2021). “Information Technology Risk Analysis Using FMEA and SAW Methods with COBIT 5,” vol. 5, pp. 1688–1697.
  25. M. Garsoux. (2021). “COBIT 5 ISACA’s new framework for IT Governance, Risk, Security and Auditing An overview,” ISACA Whitepapers, p. 39.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

COBIT 5 Risk Assessment Capability Level GAP