Call for Paper - August 2019 Edition
IJCA solicits original research papers for the August 2019 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is July 20, 2019. Read More

Critical Aspects of Project Management Causing Major Impacts on Software Development

Print
PDF
International Journal of Computer Applications
© 2011 by IJCA Journal
Number 9 - Article 7
Year of Publication: 2011
Authors:
M. Aqeel Iqbal
Farooque Azam
Ahmed Ali Qureshi
10.5120/3326-4576

Aqeel M Iqbal, Farooque Azam and Ahmed Ali Qureshi. Article: Critical Aspects of Project Management Causing Major Impacts on Software Development. International Journal of Computer Applications 27(9):39-47, August 2011. Full text available. BibTeX

@article{key:article,
	author = {M. Aqeel Iqbal and Farooque Azam and Ahmed Ali Qureshi},
	title = {Article: Critical Aspects of Project Management Causing Major Impacts on Software Development},
	journal = {International Journal of Computer Applications},
	year = {2011},
	volume = {27},
	number = {9},
	pages = {39-47},
	month = {August},
	note = {Full text available}
}

Abstract

The development process for modern softwares has become a solid engineering paradigm rather than a social activity. In this regard the project management for software development has become one of the most leading areas of interest. An affective project management and development methodology can lead to successful high quality software. The effectiveness of software project management is dependent on multi-disciplinary, inter-related factors including the management of project scope, project time, project cost, project quality, project human resource, project communication, project procurement and project integration. In this research paper a critical review has been presented about the modern practices being under used for software project management. The paper point outs the different critical aspects of the software project management causing high impacts on software development and on the society itself. A large number of co-related project management aspects with their impacts have been critically analyzed for further active research work for exposing new methodologies for managing the project activities.

Reference

  • Kloppenborg TJ, Opfer WA. Forty years of project management research: Trends, interpretations, and predictions. In: PMI Research Conference. PMI, 2000. p. 41–59.
  • Crawford L. Global body of project management knowledge and standards. In: Pinto J, Morris G, editors. The Wiley guide to managing projects. New York: Wiley; 2004. p. 1150–96.
  • Crawford LH. Project management standards: The Value of Standards (DBA thesis) Henley-on-Thames: Henley Management College/Brunel University, 2001.
  • PMI. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Pennsylvania, USA: PMI; 2000.
  • Cicmil, S., Cooke Davies, T., Crawford, L., and Richardson, K. (2009b) Exploring the Complexity of Projects: Implications of Complexity Theory for Project Management Practice Newtown Square, PA: PMI
  • Crawford L, England, D. Mapping the links between project management and systems. In: Proceedings of IRNOP, vol. 6, Turku, Finland, 2004.
  • Clegg, S. and Courpasson, D.(2004) ‘Political Hybrids, Tocquevillean views on Project Organizations’, Journal of Management Studies 41 (4): 525-547
  • Whitten, N. (2000). How Technical Must a Project Manager Be? Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
  • Cicmil, S., Hodgson, D., Lindgren, M. and Packendorff, J. (2009) ‘Project management behind the facade.’ ephemera: theory and politics in organization, 9(2) pp. 78-92.
  • Green, S. D. (2006) ‘The management of projects in the construction industry: context, discourse and self-identity’, in in Hodgson D.and Cicmil S. (eds.) Making Projects Critical, London: Palgrave
  • Hodgson, D. (2005), ‘Putting on a Professional Performance’: Performativity, Subversion and Project Management, Organization, 12 (1), 51-68
  • Lindgren, M. and Packendorff, J. (2009) ’Project leadership revisited: Towards distributed leadership perspectives in project research’. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 1 (3) pp. 285-308.
  • Cicmil, S. and Gaggiotti, H. (2009) ‘Who cares about project deadlines? A processual-relational perspective on problems with information sharing in project environments’, International Journal of Knowledge
  • Hodgson, D. and Cicmil, S. (2007) ‘The Politics of Standards in Modern Management: Making 'the Project' a Reality’, Journal of Management Studies 44 (3), pp.431-450
  • White D, Fortune J. Current practice in project management – an empirical study. Int J Project Manage 2002;20(1):1–11.