Call for Paper - March 2023 Edition
IJCA solicits original research papers for the March 2023 Edition. Last date of manuscript submission is February 20, 2023. Read More

Performance Analysis of Proactive and Reactive MANET Routing Protocols using TCP Traffic for Freeway and Random Waypoint Mobility Model

Print
PDF
International Journal of Computer Applications
© 2012 by IJCA Journal
Volume 43 - Number 7
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors:
Sunil Kr. Maakar
Sudesh Kumar
Amit Nain
10.5120/6114-8294

Sunil Kr. Maakar, Sudesh Kumar and Amit Nain. Article: Performance Analysis of Proactive and Reactive MANET Routing Protocols using TCP Traffic for Freeway and Random Waypoint Mobility Model. International Journal of Computer Applications 43(7):13-18, April 2012. Full text available. BibTeX

@article{key:article,
	author = {Sunil Kr. Maakar and Sudesh Kumar and Amit Nain},
	title = {Article: Performance Analysis of Proactive and Reactive MANET Routing Protocols using TCP Traffic for Freeway and Random Waypoint Mobility Model},
	journal = {International Journal of Computer Applications},
	year = {2012},
	volume = {43},
	number = {7},
	pages = {13-18},
	month = {April},
	note = {Full text available}
}

Abstract

Mobile ad-hoc network is a collection of wireless mobile hosts forming a temporary network without the aid of any stand-alone infrastructure or centralized administration. Mobile ad-hoc network have the attribute such as wireless connection, continuously changing topology, distributed operation and ease of deployment. In this paper we have investigated the performance of two MANET routing protocol (Proactive and Reactive) by using Freeway and Random Waypoint mobility model for mobility of nodes using TCP traffic. Freeway Mobility model has been generated by IMPORTANT (Impact of Mobility Patterns on Routing in Ad-hoc NeTwork) tool, whereas Random Waypoint by inbuilt setdest tool in NS2. A detailed simulation has been carried out in NS2 with TCP traffic sources and AODV as reactive and DSDV as proactive routing protocols. The metrics used for performance analysis are Packet Delivery Fraction, Average end-to-end Delay, Packet Loss, Routing Overhead, Normalized Routing Load and throughput. It has been observed that (proactive routing protocol) DSDV performance is better than (reactive routing protocol) AODV but at the cost of higher average end-end delay in both mobility models. Both routing protocols give optimized result in Random Waypoint mobility model as compared to Freeway Mobility Model.

References

  • S. Das, C. E. Perkins, E. Royer, "Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing", IETF Draft, June 2002.
  • C-K Toh "Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks Protocols and Systems", First Edition, Prentice Hall Inc, USA, 2002.
  • C. E. Perkins and E. M. Royer, "Ad-Hoc On Demand Distance Vector Routing", Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, New Orleans, LA, USA, pages 90-100, February 1999.
  • Elizabeth M. Royer and Chai-Keong Toh, "A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks", IEEE Personal Communications, pages 46-55, April 1999.
  • UCB/LBNL/VINT N/W Simulator cs. berkeley. edu /ns
  • "The Network Simulator - ns-2," available at http://www. isi. edu/nsnam/ns/.
  • Fan Bai, Ahmed Helmy "A Framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing Protocols for Adhoc Networks", IEEE INFOCOM 2003.
  • Tracy Camp, Jeff Boleng, Vanessa Davies "A Survey of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Network Research", Wireless Communication & Mobile Computing (WCMC): vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 483-502, 2002.
  • Perkins Charles E, Bhagwat Pravin, "Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers", In SIGCOMM UK, pp. 234-244, 1994.
  • Charles E. Perkins and Elizabeth M. Royer, "Ad-Hoc On Demand Distance Vector Routing", In Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 90– 100, February 1999.
  • P. Jacquet, and P. Muhlethaler, et al, "Optimized Link State Routing Protocol", IETF Internet draft, March 2001.
  • S. Corson and J. Macker, "Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation considerations", RFC2501, IETF Network Working Group, January 1999.
  • C. Bettstetter, G. Resta and P. Santi, "The node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model for wireless ad hoc networks," Proc. of IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 2, pp. 257–269, July–September 2003.
  • C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, S. Das, quet, "Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing", RFC 3561, July 2003.
  • N. Aschenbruck, E. Gerhands - Padilla, P. Martini, "A Survey on mobility models for Performance analysis in Tactical Mobile networks," Journal of Telecommunication and Information Technology,Vol. 2 pp. 54-61,2008.
  • Harminder S. Bindra, Sunil K. Maakar,A. L. Sanga" Performance Evaluation of two reactive routing protocol of MANET "IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 7, Issue 3, No 10, May 2010.
  • Suman Kumari , Sunil Maakar ,Suresh Kumar, R K Rathy 'Traffic Pattern Based Performance Comparison of AODV, DSDV & OLSR MANET Routing Protocols using Freeway Mobility Model' IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 2 (4) , 2011, 1606-1611.