CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Modified Jelinski-Moranda Software Reliability Model with Imperfect Debugging Phenomenon

by G. S. Mahapatra, P. Roy
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 48 - Number 18
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: G. S. Mahapatra, P. Roy
10.5120/7451-0534

G. S. Mahapatra, P. Roy . Modified Jelinski-Moranda Software Reliability Model with Imperfect Debugging Phenomenon. International Journal of Computer Applications. 48, 18 ( June 2012), 38-46. DOI=10.5120/7451-0534

@article{ 10.5120/7451-0534,
author = { G. S. Mahapatra, P. Roy },
title = { Modified Jelinski-Moranda Software Reliability Model with Imperfect Debugging Phenomenon },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { June 2012 },
volume = { 48 },
number = { 18 },
month = { June },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 38-46 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume48/number18/7451-0534/ },
doi = { 10.5120/7451-0534 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:44:27.274477+05:30
%A G. S. Mahapatra
%A P. Roy
%T Modified Jelinski-Moranda Software Reliability Model with Imperfect Debugging Phenomenon
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 48
%N 18
%P 38-46
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

In this paper, we have modified the Jelinski-Moranda (J-M) model of software reliability using imperfect debugging process in fault removal activity. The J-M model was developed assuming the debugging process to be perfect which implies that there is one-to-one correspondence between the number of failures observed and faults removed. But in reality, it is possible that the fault which is supposed to have been removed may cause a new failure. In the proposed modified J-M model, we consider that whenever a failure occurs, the detected fault is not perfectly removed and there is a chance of raising new fault/faults due to wrong diagnosis or incorrect modifications in the software. In this paper, we develop a modified J-M model which can describe the imperfect debugging process. The parameters of our modified J-M model are estimated by using maximum-likelihood estimation method. Applicability of the model has been shown on the failure data set of Musa.

References
  1. Lyu, M. R. 1996. Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. McGraw-Hill.
  2. Musa, J. D. , Iannino, A. , and Okumoto, K. 1990. Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction, Application. McGraw-Hill.
  3. Jelinski, Z. and Moranda, P. B. 1972. Software reliability research, Statistical Computer Performance Evaluation. Academic Press: New York, 465-484.
  4. Littlewood, B. 1987. How good are software reliability predictions?. Software Reliability: Achievement and Assessment. Blackwell Scientific Publications. 154-166.
  5. Musa J. D. 1975. A theory of software reliability and its application. IEEE T. Software Eng. 1(3), 312-327.
  6. Goel, A. L. , and Okumoto, K. 1979. Time dependent error detection rate model for software reliability and other performance measures. IEEE T. Reliab. R-28(3), 206-211.
  7. Yamada, S. , Ohba, M. and Osaki, S. 1983. S-shaped reliability growth modeling for software error detection. IEEE T. Reliab. R-32(5), 475-484.
  8. Ohba, M. 1984. Software reliability analysis models. IBM J. Res. Dev. 28(4), 428-443.
  9. Goel, A. L. 1985. Software reliability models: assumptions, limitations and applicability. IEEE T. Software Eng. SE-11(12), 1411-1423.
  10. Kapur, P. K. , and Garg, R. B. 1990. Optimal release policy for software reliability growth models under imperfect debugging. Oper. Res. RAIRO. 24(3), 295-305.
  11. Chang, Y. C. , and Liu, C. T. 2009. A generalized JM model with applications to imperfect debugging in software reliability. Appl. Math. Model. 33, 3578-3588.
  12. Shyur, H. J. 2003. A stochastic software reliability model with imperfect-debugging and change-point. J. Syst. Software. 66(2), 135-141.
  13. Kapur, P. K. , Singh, O. M. P. , Shatnawi, O. , and Gupta, A. 2006. A discrete NHPP model for software reliability growth with imperfect fault debugging and fault generation. Int. J. Perform. Eng. 2(4), 351-368.
  14. Prasad, R. S. , Raju, O. N. , and Kantam, R. R. L. 2010. SRGM with imperfect debugging by genetic algorithms. Int. J. Software Eng. Appl. 1(2), 66-79.
  15. Raju, O. N. 2011. Software reliability growth models for the safety critical software with imperfect debugging. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 3(8), 3019-3026.
  16. Xie, M. Dai, Y. S. and Poh, K. L. 2004. Computing System Reliability Models and Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  17. Kremer, W. 1983. Birth-death and bug counting. IEEE T. Reliab. R-32(1), 37-47.
  18. Musa, J. D. 1980. Software Reliability Data. Data & Analysis Center for Software.
  19. Dawid, A. P. 1984. Statistical theory: the prequential approach. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A. 147, 278-292.
  20. Pham, H. 2006. System Software Reliability. Springer.
  21. Bittanti, S. 1988. Software Reliability Modelling and Identification (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Springer-Verlag.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Software Reliability Jelinski-moranda Model Failure Maximum Likelihood Estimation Imperfect Debugging

Powered by PhDFocusTM