CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Comparative Performance Analysis of AODV, DSR, DSDV, LAR1 and WRP Routing Protocols in MANET using GloMoSim 2.0.3 Simulator

by Vishal Gupta
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 52 - Number 20
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Vishal Gupta
10.5120/8317-1950

Vishal Gupta . Comparative Performance Analysis of AODV, DSR, DSDV, LAR1 and WRP Routing Protocols in MANET using GloMoSim 2.0.3 Simulator. International Journal of Computer Applications. 52, 20 ( August 2012), 16-24. DOI=10.5120/8317-1950

@article{ 10.5120/8317-1950,
author = { Vishal Gupta },
title = { Comparative Performance Analysis of AODV, DSR, DSDV, LAR1 and WRP Routing Protocols in MANET using GloMoSim 2.0.3 Simulator },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2012 },
volume = { 52 },
number = { 20 },
month = { August },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 16-24 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume52/number20/8317-1950/ },
doi = { 10.5120/8317-1950 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:52:45.548949+05:30
%A Vishal Gupta
%T Comparative Performance Analysis of AODV, DSR, DSDV, LAR1 and WRP Routing Protocols in MANET using GloMoSim 2.0.3 Simulator
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 52
%N 20
%P 16-24
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

A Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is a collection of wireless mobile nodes that communicates with each other without using any existing infrastructure or centralized supervision. A major design issue for an efficient and effective routing protocol for real MANETs is, therefore, to achieve optimum values of performance parameters under network scenarios where nodes are subjected to different types of mobility that dynamically change the network topology. In this paper, I am comparing the performance of five prominent Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) protocols. My simulative study on MANET routing protocols and mobility models aims to determine the performance of current MANET routing protocols with respect to various mobility models implemented in GloMoSim 2. 0. 3 simulator. I compare a number of routing protocols including AODV, DSDV, DSR, LAR1 and WRP and the performance analysis is based on different network metrics such as Average End to End delay, Throughput, Collisions and Energy Consumption for both stationary and mobile nodes. The results of my extensive network simulations are tabulated along with a comprehensive analysis. The effort allows a fair comparison of the capabilities and limitations of different types of mobility patterns and their suitability for contemporary MANET routing protocols.

References
  1. Singh Dinesh, Maurya Ashish K. , Sarje Anil K. ; "Comparative Performance Analysis of LANMAR, LAR1, DYMO and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET using Random Waypoint Mobility Model", IEEE, pp. 62-66, 2011.
  2. M Subramanya Bhat, D Shwetha, T Devaraju J. ; "A Performance Study of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols using Qualnet Simulator," International Journal of Computer Application, vol. 28, no. 5, August 2011.
  3. Maan Fahimn, Mazhar Nauman; "MANET Routing Protocols vs Mobility Models: A Performance Evaluation", IEEE Conference ICUFN 2011, pp. 179-185, 2011.
  4. Jain Rachit, khairnar Naresh B. , Shrivastava Laxmi; "Comparative Study of Three Mobile Ad-hoc Network Routing Protocols under Different Traffic Source", IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies 2011, pp. 104-107, 2011.
  5. Shurdi Olimpjon, Miho Rozeta, Kamo Bexhet, Kolici Vladi, Rakipi Alban; "Performance Analysis of Multicast Routing Protocols MAODV, ODMRP and ADMR for MANETs", IEEE International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems 2011, pp. 596-601, 2011.
  6. Nayyar Anand; "Simulation Based Evaluation of Reactive Routing Protocols of MANET", IEEE Second International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies 2012, pp. 561-568, 2012.
  7. Khatkar Avni, Singh Yudhvir; "Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Routing Protocols in Mobile Adhoc Networks", IEEE Second International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies 2012, pp. 542-545, 2012.
  8. Vetrivelan N. and Reddy A. V. , 2008. "Performance Analysis of Three routing Protocols for Varying MANET Size", Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists.
  9. Uma M. and Padmavathi G. , 2009. "A Comparative Study and Performance Evaluation of Reactive Quality of Service Routing Protocols in MANETs", Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, pp. 223-229
  10. Royer E. M. and Toh C. K. , 1999. "A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad-Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks", IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 46-55.
  11. Shaik Syed Basha, Setty S. P. , 2010. "Performance Comparison of AODV, DSR and ANODR for Grid Placement Model" International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 8887), Volume 11, No. 12, 6-9.
  12. Perkins C. E. and Royer E. M. , 1999. "Ad Hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing," In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, New Orleans, LA, 90-100.
  13. Johnson D. , Maltz D. and Yih, 2003. "Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile AdHoc", http://www. ietf. org/internet-drafts/ draft ietf manet-DSR-09. txt, IETF Internet draft.
  14. Raju Sree Ranga and Mungara Jitendranath. 2010. "Performance Evaluation of ZRP over AODV and DSR in Mobile Adhoc Networks Using Qualnet" European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 45, No. 4. 658-674.
  15. Boukerche A. , 2004. "Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks," Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol. 9, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 333-342.
  16. Mittal S. , Kaur P. ; "Performance Comparison of AODV, DSR and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET'S," International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control & Telecommunication Technologies, 2009 (ACT '09), pp. 165-168, 28-29 Dec. 2009.
  17. Ismail, Z. , Hassan, R. ; "Performance of AODV routing protocol in Mobile Ad Hoc Network," International Symposium in Information Technology 2010 (ITSim), vol. 1, pp. 1-5, 15-17 June 2010.
  18. Rahman M. A. , Anwar F. , Naeem J. , Abedin M. S. M. , "A simulation based performance comparison of routing protocol on Mobile Ad-hoc Network (proactive, reactive and hybrid)," International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering 2010(ICCCE 2010), pp. 1-5, 11-12 May 2010.
  19. Maurya A. K. , Singh D. ; "Simulation based Performance Comparision of AODV, FSR and ZRP Routing Protocols in MANET," International Journal of Computer Application, vol. 12, no. 2, Novmber 2010.
  20. Malany A. B. , Dhulipala V. R. S. , Chandrasekaran R. M. ; "Throughput and Delay Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols," Int. J. Open Problems Compt. Math. , Vol. 2, No. 3, September 2009.
  21. Zayene M. A. , Tabbane N. ; "Performance evaluation of Location- Aided Routing protocols in ad hoc networks," Global Information Infrastructure Symposium, 2009 (GIIS '09), pp. 1-6, 23-26 June 2009.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Protocols MANET DSDV AODV DSR LAR1 WRP GloMoSim 2. 0. 3

Powered by PhDFocusTM