CFP last date
20 May 2024
Call for Paper
June Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming June edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 20 May 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

Using Bio-inspired intelligence for Web opinion Mining

by George Stylios, Christos D. Katsis, Dimitris Christodoulakis
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 87 - Number 5
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: George Stylios, Christos D. Katsis, Dimitris Christodoulakis
10.5120/15207-3610

George Stylios, Christos D. Katsis, Dimitris Christodoulakis . Using Bio-inspired intelligence for Web opinion Mining. International Journal of Computer Applications. 87, 5 ( February 2014), 36-43. DOI=10.5120/15207-3610

@article{ 10.5120/15207-3610,
author = { George Stylios, Christos D. Katsis, Dimitris Christodoulakis },
title = { Using Bio-inspired intelligence for Web opinion Mining },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { February 2014 },
volume = { 87 },
number = { 5 },
month = { February },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 36-43 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume87/number5/15207-3610/ },
doi = { 10.5120/15207-3610 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:05:09.500233+05:30
%A George Stylios
%A Christos D. Katsis
%A Dimitris Christodoulakis
%T Using Bio-inspired intelligence for Web opinion Mining
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 87
%N 5
%P 36-43
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

This work proposes a bio-inspired based methodology in order to extract and evaluate user's web texts / posts. To validate the methodology, a dataset is constructed using real data arising from Greek fora. The obtained results are compared with a commonly used machine learning technique (decision trees- C4. 5 algorithm). The bio-inspired algorithm (namely the hybrid PSO/ACO2 algorithm) achieved average classification accuracy 90. 59% in a 10 fold cross validation experiment, outperforming the C4. 5 algorithm (83. 66%). The proposed methodology could be easily integrated with a decision support system providing services in the fields of e-commerce or e-government in order to help merchants acquire customer satisfaction or public administrators capture common understanding.

References
  1. Kolbitsch, J. and Maurer H. , The transformation of the Web: How emerging communities shape the information we consume. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 2006. 12(2): p. 187-213.
  2. Seyberd, H. , Internet use in households and by individuals in 2012, t. a. s. Industry, Editor. 2012, Eurostat.
  3. Xu, G. , Zhang, Y. , Modelling User Behaviour for Web Recommendation Using LDA Model, in in Proceedings of International Workshop on E-Commerce, Business, and Services. 2008.
  4. Breck, E. and Y. Choi, Joint extraction of entities and relations for opinion recognition, in Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2006: Morristown, NJ, USA.
  5. Ali, H. , Macaulay, L. , Zhao, L. A Collaboration Pattern Language for e-Participation":A Strategy for Reuse. in Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on e-Government. 2009.
  6. Rushdi Saleh, M. , et al. , Experiments with SVM to classify opinions in different domains. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011. 38(12): p. 14799-14804.
  7. Dave, K. , Lawrence, S. , Pennock D. M. , Opinion extraction and semantic classi?cation of product reviews, in In Proceedings of WWW. 2003. p. 519-528.
  8. Chesley, P. , Vincent, B. , Xu, L. , Srihari, R. Using verbs and adjectives to automatically classify blog sentiment. in Proceedings of AAAI-CAAW. 2006.
  9. Lin, W. H. , Wilson, T. , Wiebe, J. , Hauptmann, A. Which side are you on? Identifying perspectives at the document and sentence levels. in Conference on computational natural language learning. 2006.
  10. Allen, C. T. , et al. , A place for emotion in attitude models. Journal of Business Research, 2005. 58(4): p. 494-499.
  11. Shulman, S. , Hovy, E. , Callan, J. , Zavestoski, S. Language processing technologies for electronic rulemaking. in Proceedings of InterNational Conference on Digital Government Research. 2006.
  12. Hatzivassiloglou, V. , Wiebe, J. , Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity, in International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2000. p. 299-305.
  13. Kamps, J. , Marx, M. , Mokken, R. J. , Rijke, M. D. , Using wordnet to measure semantic orientation of adjectives. , in Conference on language resources and evaluation. 2004. p. 1115-1118.
  14. Pang, T. B. , Pang, B. , Lee, L. Thumbs up? sentiment classi?cation using machine learning. in In Proceedings of EMNLP. 2002.
  15. Mullen, T. , Collier, N. , Sentiment analysis using support vector machines with diverse information sources, in In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 2004. p. 412-418.
  16. Prabowo, R. , Thelwall, M. , Sentiment analysis: A combined approach. Journal of Informetrics, 2009. 3(2): p. 14.
  17. Stylios, G. , Katsis, C. D. , Glaros, C. , Simaki, V. , Christodoulakis, D. , MiCoGo, an Integrated System That Automatically Detects the Presence of Opinion in web Texts Regarding eCommerce and eGovernment, in The 12th European Conference on e-Government (ECEG, 2012). 2012: Barcelona, Spain. p. 683-690.
  18. Holden, N. P. and A. A. Freitas, A hybrid PSO/ACO algorithm for classification, in Proceedings of the 2007 GECCO conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation. 2007, ACM: London, United Kingdom. p. 2745-2750.
  19. Chomsky, N. , Peng, F. C. C. , Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar American Anthropologist, 1973. 75(6): p. 1918-1921.
  20. Carbonell, J. , Subjective Understanding: Computer Models of Belief Systems. PhD thesis, in Yale. 1979.
  21. Kwon, N. , Shulman, S. W. , Hovy, E, Multidimensional text analysis for eRulemaking, in Proceedings of DG. O (Inter)National Conference on Digital Government Research. 2006.
  22. Shulman, S. , Hovy, E. , Callan, J. , Zavestoski, S. Language processing technologies for electronic rulemaking. in Proceedings of DG. O (Inter)National Conference on Digital Government Research. 2006.
  23. O'Leary, D. E. , Blog mining-review and extensions: "From each according to his opinion". Decision Support Systems, 2011. 51(4): p. 821-830.
  24. Pang, B. , Lee Li. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in information Retrieval, 2008. 2, 1-135 DOI: DOI:10. 1561/1500000001.
  25. Esuli, K. , Opinion mining. 2009.
  26. Ku, L. W. and H. H. Chen, Mining opinions from the web: Beyond relevance retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007. 58(12): p. 1838-1850.
  27. Xu, Z. and R. Ramnath. Mining opinion from Poll Results in Web Pages in www2009. 2009. Madrid, Spain.
  28. Furuse, O. , et al. Opinion sentence search engine on open-domain blog. in Proccedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Hyderabad. 2007. India.
  29. Quan, X. J. , et al. , Short text similarity based on probabilistic topics. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2010. 25(3): p. 473-491.
  30. Weng, L. , et al. , Query by document via a decomposition-based two-level retrieval approach, in Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval. 2011, ACM: Beijing, China. p. 505-514.
  31. Nallapati, R. , Cohen, W. , A New Unsupervised Model for Topics and Influence of Blogs, in In International Conference for Weblogs and Social Media. 2008. p. 84-92.
  32. Xiaowen, D. , Liu, B. The utility of linguistic rules in opinion mining. in Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval 2007. New York.
  33. Miao, Q. L. , Q. D. Li, and R. W. Dai, AMAZING: A sentiment mining and retrieval system. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009. 36(3): p. 7192-7198.
  34. Zhongwu. Zhai, et al. Clustering Product Features for Opinion Mining. in Proceedings of 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Minin, . 2011. Hong Kong, China.
  35. Sun, J. T. , et al. A comparative web search system. in 15th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW). 2006. Edinburg, Scotland.
  36. Breck, E. , Y. Choi, and C. Cardie. Identifying expressions of opinion in context. in In Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Arti?cial Intelligence (IJCAI-2007). 2007. Hyderabad, India,.
  37. Breck, E. , Y. Choi, and C. Cardie. Joint extraction of entities and relations for opinion recognition. in Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2006. Morristown, NJ, USA.
  38. Choi, Y. and C. Cardie. Structured local training and biased potential functions for conditional random ?elds with application to coreference resolution. in In Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; . 2007. Rochester, New York.
  39. Ulincy, B. , et al. Uses of Ontologies in Open-Source Blog Mining in In proceedings of the Ontology for the intelligence Community. 2007. Columbia, Maryland.
  40. Jin, X. , Zhou, Y. , Mobasher, B. A unified approach to personalization based on probabilistic latent semantic models of web usage and content. in AAAI 2004 Workshop on Semantic Web Personalization (SWP'04). 2004. San Jose.
  41. Wiebe, J. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. in In Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI -2000). 2000.
  42. Wiebe, J. , et al. , Learning subjective language. 2002, University of Pittsburgh: Pennsylvania. .
  43. Hatzivassiloglou, V. and J. M. Wiebe, Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity, in Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1. 2000, Association for Computational Linguistics: Saarbrücken, Germany. p. 299-305.
  44. Roussinov, D. and J. L. Zhao, Automatic discovery of similarity relationships through Web mining. Decision Support Systems, 2003. 35(1): p. 149-166.
  45. Wong, T. -L. and W. Lam, An unsupervised method for joint information extraction and feature mining across different Web sites. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 2009. 68(1): p. 107-125.
  46. Yang, H. -C. and C. -H. Lee, A text mining approach on automatic generation of web directories and hierarchies. Expert Systems with Applications, 2004. 27(4): p. 645-663.
  47. Velásquez, J. D. , L. E. Dujovne, and G. L'Huillier, Extracting significant Website Key Objects: A Semantic Web mining approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2011. 24(8): p. 1532-1541.
  48. Turney, P. Thumps up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. in In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the association for Computational linguistics. 2002.
  49. Pang, B. , L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan. Thumps up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. in In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-02). 2002.
  50. Yu, H. and V. Hatzivassiloglou. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. in In Proceedings of the Conference on empirical Methods in Natural language Processing 2003.
  51. Stylios, G. , et al. Deciphering the Public Stance Towards Govermental Decisions. in 10th European Conference on E-Government. Ireland.
  52. Wiebe, J. , R. Bruce, and T. O'Hara. Development and use of a gold standard data set for subjectivy classifications. . in In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lingyistics (ACL-99). 1999.
  53. Stylios G. , et al. , Public Opinion Mining for Governmental Decisions. Online Journal for Government. , 2011.
  54. Eneva, E. , Hoberman, R. , Lita, L. , Learning Within-Sentence Semantic Coherence, in Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2001.
  55. Lapata, M. , Barzilay, R. , Automatic evaluation of text coherence: Models and representations, in Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2005.
  56. Barzilay, R. and M. Lapata, Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Computational Linguistics, 2008. 34(1): p. 1-34.
  57. Holden, N. and A. A. Freitas, A Hybrid PSO/ACO Algorithm for Discovering Classification Rules in Data Mining. Journal of Artificial Evolution and Applications, 2008. 2008.
  58. Quinlan, R. J. , Programs for Machine Learning. 1993: Morgan Kauffman.
  59. Kennedy, J. and R. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. in Neural Networks, 1995. Proceedings. , IEEE International Conference on. 1995.
  60. Dorigo, M. , V. Maniezzo, and A. Colorni, Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. Ieee Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics, 1996. 26(1): p. 29-41.
  61. Geisser, S. , Predictive Inference (Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability). 1993: Published by Chapman and Hall/CRC
  62. Kohavi, R. , "A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection", in Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1995, Morgan Kaufmann. p. 1137-1143.
  63. Devijver, P. A. , Pattern Recognition: A Statistical Approach. 1982, London, GB: Prentice-Hall.
  64. Stylios, G. , Christodoulakis, D. , Besharat, J. , Vonitsanou, M. , Kotrotsos, I. , Koumpouri, A. Stamou, S, Public Opinion Mining for Governmental Decisions. Electronic Journal of e-Governmen, 2010. 8(2): p. 14.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Bio-inspired Algorithms Decision Trees PSO/ACO2 Web texts Web Opinion Mining

Powered by PhDFocusTM