A Novel Approach based on Image Processing in the Analysis of Human Dental Forensic
|
10.5120/15718-4618 |
Samarth Borker and Hiroj Naik. Article: A Novel Approach based on Image Processing in the Analysis of Human Dental Forensic. International Journal of Computer Applications 89(16):39-43, March 2014. Full text available. BibTeX
@article{key:article,
author = {Samarth Borker and Hiroj Naik},
title = {Article: A Novel Approach based on Image Processing in the Analysis of Human Dental Forensic},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Applications},
year = {2014},
volume = {89},
number = {16},
pages = {39-43},
month = {March},
note = {Full text available}
}
Abstract
Forensic Odontology is a study dedicated to identifying individuals based on specific characteristics of teeth structural arrangement. Human bite mark analysis is by far the most demanding and complicated part of forensic dentistry. This process generally involves human interaction and hence tends to bias. In this paper a system is tested and implemented that reduces human bias to certain extent. Each person has a unique dental arrangement which is exploited to identify an individual to the exclusion of all others. In this paper diverse approaches have been proposed for human bite mark identification and human dental radiograph identification. The experimental results clearly demonstrate that the approach significantly outperforms the existing ones in terms of execution time. The proposed method is also seen to be effective under a wide variety of imaging conditions.
References
- Tanmay Dharmadhikari. 2006. Forensic Odontology using Digital Geometry; Augus, Purdue University Indianapolis, Indiana.
- Sims BG, Grant JH, Cameron JM. 1973. Bitemarks in the battered baby syndrome. Med. Sci. law 13:207-10
- I. A. Pretty and D. Sweet. 2001. A look at forensic dentistry – part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity. British Dental Journal, vol. 190(7): pag. 359–366.
- J Taylor; 2009 A brief history of forensic odontology and disaster victim identification practices in Australia; The University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, New South Wales, Australia.
- www. wikipedia. org/wiki/september 11 2001 attacks (last accessed on November 2012).
- Furness J. 1974. A new method for the identification for teeth marks in cases of assault and homicide. Br. Dent J 124:261-67
- Glen N. Wagner. 1986. Bitemark Identification in child abuse cases. Pediatric dentistry: Vol 8 Special Issue 1.
- Kapil Verma, Bhawana Joshi, Charu H Joshi and reject Paul. 2013. Bite mark as Physical Evidence from the Crime Scene – An Overview, Open Access Scientific Reports Vol 2. Issue1
- Furness J. 1974. A new method for the identification for teeth marks in cases of assault and homicide. Br. Dent J 124:261-67
- Claudia s Oaita DMD , UM F TG. Mures; 2007A Computerized Approach in Forensic dentistry; Interdisciplinarity Engineering Scientific International Conference
- Sweet D, Parhar M, Wood R E. 1998. Computer-based production of bite mark overlays. J Forensic Science; 43: 1046-1051Forman
- Diane. ; Stephen Brent Dove; 2009. Computer-aided Dental Identification:An Objective Method for Assessment of Radiographic Image Similarity; J Forensic Sci, January, Vol. 54.
- A. Pretty and D. Sweet. , 2001. Digital bite mark overlays an analysis of effectiveness. Journal of Forensic Science, 46(6):13851390.
- PM Mahasantipriya, U. Yeesarapat, T. Suriyadet, J. Sricharoen, A. Dumrongwanich and T. Thaispathump 2011. Bitemark Identification Using Neural Network: A Preliminary study. Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists Vol I IMECS Honk Kong
- Johansen RJ, Bowers CM. 2000 . Digital Analysis of Bite Mark Evidence using Adobe Photoshop. Santa Barbara, California: Forensic Imaging Services.
- Michael N. Sobel; 2007 . Chapter 70 Forensic Odontology , DMD D-ABFO.
- Page D. 2005. 'Digital radiography in Forensic Odontology' Forensic Magazine, Apr/May issue.
- Beale DR. 1991. The importance of dental records for identification. NZ Dent J;87:84-7.