CFP last date
20 June 2024
Reseach Article

How Minimal are MapReduce Arrangements for Binning Expressionsh

by Ravinder Prakash G, Kiran M
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 99 - Number 11
Year of Publication: 2014
Authors: Ravinder Prakash G, Kiran M
10.5120/17415-8195

Ravinder Prakash G, Kiran M . How Minimal are MapReduce Arrangements for Binning Expressionsh. International Journal of Computer Applications. 99, 11 ( August 2014), 7-14. DOI=10.5120/17415-8195

@article{ 10.5120/17415-8195,
author = { Ravinder Prakash G, Kiran M },
title = { How Minimal are MapReduce Arrangements for Binning Expressionsh },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { August 2014 },
volume = { 99 },
number = { 11 },
month = { August },
year = { 2014 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 7-14 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume99/number11/17415-8195/ },
doi = { 10.5120/17415-8195 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T22:27:55.205190+05:30
%A Ravinder Prakash G
%A Kiran M
%T How Minimal are MapReduce Arrangements for Binning Expressionsh
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 99
%N 11
%P 7-14
%D 2014
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

An intention of MapReduce Sets for Binning expressions analysis has to suggest criteria how Binning expressions in Binning data can be defined in a meaningful way and how they should be compared. Similitude based MapReduce Sets for Binning Expression Analysis and MapReduce Sets for Assignment is expected to adhere to fundamental principles of the scientific Binning process that are expressiveness of Binning models and reproducibility of their Binning inference. Binning expressions are assumed to be elements of a Binning expression space or Conjecture class and Binning data provide "information" which of these Binning expressions should be used to interpret the Binning data. An inference Binning algorithm constructs the mapping between Binning data and Binning expressions, in particular by a Binning cost minimization process. Fluctuations in the Binning data often limit the Binning precision, which we can achieve to uniquely identify a single Binning expression as interpretation of the Binning data. We advocate an information theoretic perspective on Binning expression analysis to resolve this dilemma where the tradeoff between Binning informativeness of statistical inference Binning and their Binning stability is mirrored in the information-theoretic Binning optimum of high Binning information rate and zero communication expression error. The inference Binning algorithm is considered as an outlier object Binning path, which naturally limits the resolution of the Binning expression space given the uncertainty of the Binning data.

References
  1. Ravi Prakash G, Kiran M, and Saikat Mukherjee, Asymmetric Key-Value Split Pattern Assumption over MapReduce Behavioral Model, International Journal of Computer Applications, Volume 86 – No 10, Page 30-34, January 2014.
  2. Kiran M. , Saikat Mukherjee and Ravi Prakash G. , Characterization of Randomized Shuffle and Sort Quantifiability in MapReduce Model, International Journal of Computer Applications, 51-58, Volume 79, No. 5, October 2013.
  3. Amresh Kumar, Kiran M. , Saikat Mukherjee and Ravi Prakash G. , Verification and Validation of MapReduce Program model for Parallel K-Means algorithm on Hadoop Cluster, International Journal of Computer Applications, 48-55, Volume 72, No. 8, June 2013.
  4. Kiran M. , Amresh Kumar, Saikat Mukherjee and Ravi Prakash G. , Verification and Validation of MapReduce Program Model for Parallel Support Vector Machine Algorithm on Hadoop Cluster, International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 317-325, Vol. 10, Issue 3, No. 1, May 2013.
  5. Aniruddha Basak, Irina Brinster and Ole J. Mengshoel. MapReduce for Bayesian Network Parameter Learning using the EM Algorithm, Proc. of Big Learning: Algorithms, Systems and Tools, 1-6, December 2012.
  6. Berli'nska, J. , Drozdowski, M. : Scheduling divisible MapReduce computations. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput 71(3), 450-459 (2011).
  7. Emanuel Vianna, Giovanni Comarela, Tatiana Pontes, Jussara Almeida, Virgilio Almeida, Kevin Wilkinson, Harumi Kuno, Umeshwar Dayal. Analytical Performance Models for MapReduce Workloads, Int J Parallel Prog 41:495-525 (2013).
  8. Erik B. Reed and Ole J. Mengshoel. Scaling Bayesian Network Parameter Learning with Expectation Maximization using MapReduce, Proc. of Big Learning: Algorithms, Systems and Tools, 1-5, December 2012.
  9. Ravi Prakash G, Kiran M and Saikat Mukherjee, On Randomized Preference Limitation Protocol for Quantifiable Shuffle and Sort Behavioral Implications in MapReduce Programming Model, Parallel & Cloud Computing, Vol. 3, Issue 1, 1-14, January 2014.
  10. Ravi Prakash G, and Kiran M, On The Least Economical MapReduce Sets for Summarization Expressions, International Journal of Computer Applications, 13-20, Volume 94, No. 7, May 2014.
  11. Ravi (Ravinder) Prakash G, Kiran M. , On Randomized Minimal MapReduce Sets for Filtering Expressions, International Journal of Computer Applications, Volume 98, No. 3, Pages 1-8, July 2014.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

MapReduce Binning expressions kernel function.