Redefining and Extending the Scope of System Development Life Cycle: Perspective of Today’s and Futuristic Human-System Interaction Environment

Abstract

With the latest innovations in the field of digital computing, communication and interconnecting technology, a new and of its own type of pervasive physical-digital ecosystem has started to emerge and in future it will be more ubiquitous, more dominant, more potent, more useful, more helpful, more usable. Finally, it will emerge as inevitable and indispensable part of our mundane interaction environment and everyday lifestyle experience. The designers, developers and practitioners of human-system interaction design have got a vital role to play in this transformation. The system development life cycle is the fundamental iterative reference cycle that specifies how to design and develop such technological systems. This work first focuses on those aspects which are of most significance from point of view of human-human concerns mediated by human-system interaction and are not appropriately addressed by canonical interaction-system development life cycle. This work then extends it along with specifying the realizing methodologies, in order to broaden the scope of the canonical system development life cycle to fulfil the present and future requisites in relation to people's interaction with the totality of ubiquitous environment in all respects.

References

• Carroll, J. M. 2008. Human-Computer Interaction, Second Impression. Pearson Education.
• Sharp, H. , Rogers, Y. and Preece, J. 2007. Interaction Design: beyond Human Computer Interaction, Second Edition. Wiley India.
• Pathak, M. , Verma, B. and Patel R. 2012. Intertwining Cognitive and Affective Intelligence into Digital Artifacts: An Infrastructural Approach. IEEE Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction, 1-7
• Richard Harper, Tom Rodden, Yvonne Rogers and Abigail Sellen (Editors), 2008 Being Human: Human-Computer Interaction in the year 2020, Publisher: Microsoft Research Ltd
• Chang, E. , Dillon, T. , and Calder D. 2008. Human System Interaction with Confident Computing: the Mega Trend. International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), 1-11.
• Wakkary, R. and Maestri, L. 2008. Aspects of Everyday Design: Resourcefulness, Adaptation, and Emergence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(5), 1–14.
• Biswas, P. , Robinson P. and Langdon P. 2012. Designing Inclusive Interfaces through User Modeling and Simulation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(1), 1-33.
• Pressman, R. S. 2010. Software Engineering: A practitioner's Approach, Mc GRAW HILL International Edition.
• Rusu, C. , Rusu, V. , and Roncagliolo, S. 2008. Usability Practice: The Appealing Way to HCI. 1st International Conference on Advances in Computer Human Interaction, 265--270.
• Ehlert, P. 2003. Intelligent user interface: introduction and survey," Research Report DKS03-01 / ICE 01, Version 0. 9.
• Pathak, M. , Patel, R. and Verma, B. 2010. Framework for effective and efficient communication using intelligent and adaptive interfaces, Second IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI 2010) Allahabad, India, 115—120.
• Weiser, M. 1991. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American. 265, Nr. 3, 94-101.
• Fischer, G. 2001. User Modeling in Human-Computer Interaction. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 65-86.
• Zhang, J. & Ghorbani, A. A. 2007. GUMSAWS: A Generic User Modeling Server for Adaptive Web Systems. Fifth Annual IEEE Conference on Communication Networks and Services Research. 117-124.
• Korth, A. , and Plumbaum, T. 2007. A Framework for Ubiquitous User Modeling. IEEE International Conference of Information Reuse and Integration, 291-297.
• Leonidis, A. , Antona, M. and Stephanidis C. 2012. Rapid Prototyping of Adaptable User Interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(4), 213-235.
• R. W. Picard, E. Vyzas, and J. Healey. 2001. Towards machine emotional intelligence: analysis of affective physiological state, IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 23, No. 10, 1175—1191.
• J. Liu and H. Ando. 2008. Emotion eliciting and decision making by psychodynamic appraisal mechanism, International Conference on Human System Interaction (HIS), Kralow, Poland, 645— 650.
• Chee Kit Yee, Choo Seah Ling, Wong Seok Yee, and Wan Mohd Nazmee Wan Zainon. 2012. GUI design based on cognitive psychology: theoretical, empirical and practical approaches. 8th International Conference on Computing Technology and Information Management (ICCM), vol. 2, 836 – 841.
• Calvo, R. A. and D'Mello, S. 2010. Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, Vol. 1, No. 1, 18-37.
• Rogers, Y. 2006. Moving on from Weiser's Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences, Ubicomp 2006, LNCS 4206, Springer-Verlag Berlin, 404 – 421
• Guida, G. and Lamperti, G. 2000. AMMETH: A Methodology for Requirements Analysis of Advanced Human-System Interfaces, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 30, No. 3, 298-321.
• Chang, E. , and Dillon, T. S. 2006, A Usability-Evaluation Metric Based on a Soft-Computing Approach, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 36, No. 2, 356-372.
• Brinkman, W. P. , Haakma, R. , and Bouwhuis, D. G. 2008. Component-Specific Usability Testing, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems And Humans, Vol. 38, No. 5, 1143-1155.

Index Terms

Keywords