CFP last date
20 March 2024
Reseach Article

RWP Mobility Model based Performance Evaluation of IARP, IERP and Ospfv2 in MANET

Published on September 2016 by Subodh Kumar, Pankaj Varshney, N. K. Mishra
National Conference on Advances in Computing Applications
Foundation of Computer Science USA
NCACA2016 - Number 2
September 2016
Authors: Subodh Kumar, Pankaj Varshney, N. K. Mishra
287e47e1-7fc6-4140-aa25-a0890900de63

Subodh Kumar, Pankaj Varshney, N. K. Mishra . RWP Mobility Model based Performance Evaluation of IARP, IERP and Ospfv2 in MANET. National Conference on Advances in Computing Applications. NCACA2016, 2 (September 2016), 8-11.

@article{
author = { Subodh Kumar, Pankaj Varshney, N. K. Mishra },
title = { RWP Mobility Model based Performance Evaluation of IARP, IERP and Ospfv2 in MANET },
journal = { National Conference on Advances in Computing Applications },
issue_date = { September 2016 },
volume = { NCACA2016 },
number = { 2 },
month = { September },
year = { 2016 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 8-11 },
numpages = 4,
url = { /proceedings/ncaca2016/number2/26175-1042/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 National Conference on Advances in Computing Applications
%A Subodh Kumar
%A Pankaj Varshney
%A N. K. Mishra
%T RWP Mobility Model based Performance Evaluation of IARP, IERP and Ospfv2 in MANET
%J National Conference on Advances in Computing Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V NCACA2016
%N 2
%P 8-11
%D 2016
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

We have analyzed performance of IARP, IERP and OSPFv2 routing protocols. The performace simulations on QualNet 5. 0. 2 simulator and performance of IARP, IERT and OSPFv2 routing protocols have been evaluated for varying node density (20, 40, 60, and 80) with varying speed (10, 20). The performance of these routing protocols has been analysed on the basis of performance metrics such as average end-to-end delay, average jitter and average throughput. It has been observed that IERP routing protocol outperform IARP and OSPFv2 in case of 20 nodes density in case of throughput. However, the IARP routing protocol clearly outperforma IERP and OSPFv2 routing protocols as the IARP routing protocol has shown the quite satisfactory results for average-end-to-end delay and average jitter in comparison of IERP and OSPFv2 routing protocols. Overall, the performance of all routing protocols simulated in this paper was highly affected with increasing node density and speed.

References
  1. Jun-Zhao Sun, Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking: An Essential Technology for Pervasive computing, in Proc. International Conference on Info-Tech and Info-Net, vol-3, pp. 316-321, 2001.
  2. Kumar S. , Agrawal G. S. and Sharma S. K. , "Impact of Mobility Models on MANETs Routing Protocols", INROADS, 3(1), pp. 142-147, 2014.
  3. Kumar S. , Agrawal G. S. and Sharma S. K. , "Performance Comparison Of Olsr And Star Routing Protocols In Manets Using Random Waypoint Mobility ModeL", International Journal of Development Research, 4(8), pp. 1656-1659, 2014.
  4. Y. Navaneeth Krishnan , Dr Shobha G "Performance Analysis of OSPF and EIGRP Routing Protocols for Greener Internetworking" International Conference on Green High Performance Computing ,2013.
  5. Jagdeep Singh, Dr. Rajiv Mahajan "Simulation Based Comparative Study of RIP, OSPF and EIGRP" International Journal of Advanced.
  6. Kumar, S. , Agrawal, G. S. and Sharma S. K. , "Impact of Mobility Models on MANETs Routing Protocols", Inroads, 3, pp. 142-147, 2014.
  7. Imrich Chlamtac, Marco Conti, Jennifer J-N Liu, "Mobile Ad Hoc Networking-Imperatives and Challenges", Elsevier, 2003, 13-64.
  8. Priyanka Goyal, Vinti Parmar, Rahul Rishi, "MANET: Vulnerabilities, Challenges, Attacks, Applications", International Journal of Computational Engineering & Management, Vol. 11, January 2011, 32-37.
  9. Jiazi YI, "A Survey on the Applications of MANET", Polytech' Nantes, February 2008.
  10. A Rahim, I Ahmed, Z S Khan, M Sher, M Shoaib, A Javed, R Mahmood, "A Comparative Study of Mobile and Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks", International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, Vol. 02, No. 04,November 2009. 195-197.
  11. G. Vijaya Kumar, Y Vasudev Reddyr, Dr. M. Nagendra, "Current Research Work on Routing Protocols for MANET: A Literature Survey", International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, Vol. 02, No. 03, 2010, 706-713.
  12. Jun-Zhao Sun, "Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: An Essential Technology for Pervasive Computing", InfoTech and Info-net, 2001. Proceedings. ICII 2001- Beijing. 2001 International conference, 2001, Vol. No. 03, 316-321.
  13. The QualNet simulator www. scalable-networks. com.
  14. H. Julian, B. Sameer, T. Mineo, B. Rajive, A. J. Michael, Performance of Mobile Ad-oc Networking Routing Protocols in Realistic Scenarios, Military Communications Conference, 2003. MILCOM 03. 2003 IEEE (Volume: 2 ), ISBN, 0-7803-8140-8, Pp. 1268-1273 Vol. 2, OCT 2003.
  15. Kumar, S. , Agrawal, G. S. and Sharma S. K. , "Impact of CBR, FTP Traffic Patterns and Varying node density on Performance of Routing Protocols in MANETs", IJCSMC, 4 (1), pp. 262-269, 2015.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Manet Routing Protocols Performance Metrics