CFP last date
22 April 2024
Reseach Article

Autonomic Computing: A Technological Evolution, New Facet of IT

Published on May 2012 by Jyoti Bansal, Meenakshi
National Workshop-Cum-Conference on Recent Trends in Mathematics and Computing 2011
Foundation of Computer Science USA
RTMC - Number 11
May 2012
Authors: Jyoti Bansal, Meenakshi
87dcda24-df71-43b5-9ebc-9d8ee55434e1

Jyoti Bansal, Meenakshi . Autonomic Computing: A Technological Evolution, New Facet of IT. National Workshop-Cum-Conference on Recent Trends in Mathematics and Computing 2011. RTMC, 11 (May 2012), 31-35.

@article{
author = { Jyoti Bansal, Meenakshi },
title = { Autonomic Computing: A Technological Evolution, New Facet of IT },
journal = { National Workshop-Cum-Conference on Recent Trends in Mathematics and Computing 2011 },
issue_date = { May 2012 },
volume = { RTMC },
number = { 11 },
month = { May },
year = { 2012 },
issn = 0975-8887,
pages = { 31-35 },
numpages = 5,
url = { /proceedings/rtmc/number11/6704-1102/ },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Proceeding Article
%1 National Workshop-Cum-Conference on Recent Trends in Mathematics and Computing 2011
%A Jyoti Bansal
%A Meenakshi
%T Autonomic Computing: A Technological Evolution, New Facet of IT
%J National Workshop-Cum-Conference on Recent Trends in Mathematics and Computing 2011
%@ 0975-8887
%V RTMC
%N 11
%P 31-35
%D 2012
%I International Journal of Computer Applications
Abstract

For decades system components and software have been evolving to deal with the increased complexity of system control, resource sharing and operational management. Autonomic computing is being viewed as an answer to the growing problem of complexity. The most phenomenal point is that it is inspired by the nature itself. This paper examines the genesis of autonomic computing, the nature’s analogy to this new technology, the fundamental characteristics of autonomic systems, the current state of work done in this direction, the glimpse of future shape of IT industry and the challenges to be addressed for this technology to come alive. Viewing the current state of IT industry, the autonomic computing seems the most promising idea.

References
  1. P. Horn, Autonomic Computing: IBM’s Perspective on the State of Information Technology, IBM Corporation (October 15, 2001); available at http://www.research.ibm.com/autonomic/manifesto/autonomic_computing.pdf.
  2. D. A. Patterson, A. Brown, P. Broadwell, G. Candea, M. Chen, J. Cutler, P. Enriquez, A. Fox, E. Kiciman, M. Merzbacher, D. Oppenheimer, N. Sastry, W. Tetzlaff, J. Traupman, N. Treuhaft, Recovery-Oriented Computing (ROC): Motivation, Definition, Techniques, and Case Studies, U.C. Berkeley Computer Science Technical Report, UCB//CSD-02-1175, University of California, Berkeley (March 15, 2002).
  3. A. Brown and D. A. Patterson, ?To Err Is Human,? Proceedings of the First Workshop on Evaluating and Architecting System dependabilitY (EASY ’01), Goeteborg, Sweden (July 2001).
  4. Application Response Measurement Issue 3.0 Java Binding, Open Group Technical Standard CO14, The Open Group (October 2001), at http://www.opengroup.org/products/publications/catalog/ c014.htm.
  5. Web Services Toolkit, alphaWorks, IBM Corporation (July 26, 2000), http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/webservices toolkit.
  6. The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, I. Foster and C. Kesselman, Editors, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA (1999).
  7. See http://www.globus.org, the home of the Globus Project, the Globus Toolkit (GT3), and work related to the Open Grid Services Architecture (OGSA).
  8. J. Jann, L. A. Browning, and R. S. Burugula, ?Dynamic Reconfiguration: Basic Building Blocks for Autonomic Computing on IBM pSeries Servers,? IBM Systems Journal 42, No. 1, 29 37 (2003).
  9. D. A. Norman, A. Ortony, and D. M. Russell, ?Affect and Machine Design: Lessons for the Development of Autonomous Machines,? IBM Systems Journal 42, No. 1, 38–44 (2003).
  10. V. Markl, G. M. Lohman, and V. Raman, ?LEO: An Autonomic Query Optimizer for DB2,? IBM Systems Journal 42, No. 1, 98-106 (2003).
  11. D. M. Chess, C. C. Palmer, and S. R. White, ?Security in an Autonomic Computing Environment,? IBM Systems Journal 42, No. 1, 107–118 (2003).
  12. G. Lanfranchi, P. Della Peruta, A. Perrone, and D. Calvanese, ?Toward a New Landscape of Systems Management in an Autonomic Computing Environment,? IBM Systems Journal 42, No. 1, 119–128 (2003).
  13. Y. Diao, J. L. Hellerstein, S. Parekh, and J. P. Bigus, ?ManagingWebServer Performance with AutoTune Agents,? IBM Systems Journal 42, No. 1, 136–149 (2003).
  14. D. F. Bantz, C. Bisdikian, C. Challener, J. P. Karidis, S. Mastrianni, A. Mohindra, D. G. Shea, and M. Vanover, ?Autonomic Personal Computing,? IBM Systems Journal 42, No. 1, 165–176 (2003).
  15. J. W. Strickland, V. W. Freeh, X. Ma, S. S. Vazhkudai, ""Governor: Autonomic Throttling for Aggressive Idle Resource Scavenging,"" Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC'05), 2005.
  16. V. Markl, G. M. Lohman and V. Raman, ""LEO: An Autonomic Query Optimizer for DB2,"" IBM Systems Journal Special Issue on Autonomic Computing, January 2001.
  17. Z. Zhang, S. Lin, Q. Lian, C. Jin, ""RepStore: A Self-Managing and Self-Tuning Storage Backend with Smart Bricks,"" Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC'04), 2004.
  18. Ilyas, P. J. Haas, V. G. Markl, P. G. Brown and A. I. Aboulnaga, ""CORDS: Automatic discovery of correlations and soft functional dependencies,"" SIGMOD 2004, ACM, February 2004.
  19. J. Chakravarti, G. Baumgartner, M. Lauria, ""The Organic Grid: Self-Organizing Computation on a Peer-to-Peer Network,"" Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC'04), 2004.
  20. Wildstrom, P. Stone, E. Witchel, R. J. Mooney, M. Dahlin, ""Towards Self-Configuring Hardware for Distributed Computer Systems,"" Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC'05), 2005
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Autonomic computing Complexity Characteristics Current State Future