CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Proposed Semi-Distributed Framework to Enhance Web Performance

by Payal Beniwal, Atul Garg
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 141 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Payal Beniwal, Atul Garg
10.5120/ijca2016909913

Payal Beniwal, Atul Garg . Proposed Semi-Distributed Framework to Enhance Web Performance. International Journal of Computer Applications. 141, 12 ( May 2016), 1-6. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016909913

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016909913,
author = { Payal Beniwal, Atul Garg },
title = { Proposed Semi-Distributed Framework to Enhance Web Performance },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2016 },
volume = { 141 },
number = { 12 },
month = { May },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-6 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume141/number12/24833-2016909913/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016909913 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:43:19.425231+05:30
%A Payal Beniwal
%A Atul Garg
%T Proposed Semi-Distributed Framework to Enhance Web Performance
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 141
%N 12
%P 1-6
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Server load balancing is a technique of circulating client requests across a group of servers. Static and Dynamic load balancing methods are used to distribute the workload equitably over every node of the system. Dynamic load balancing is adaptive in nature and performs load distribution at run time, which makes it more suitable for systems where workload is unpredictable, as compared to static load balancing methods. Two approaches namely- Completely Distributed and a proposed approach Semi- Distributed are tested against two applications – database and ftp. Efficiency of models is tested using various parameters of FTP, IP, and TCP. Simulation results show that semi-distributed method provides better system efficiency and performance.

References
  1. Abubakar, Haroon Rashid and Usman, “Evaluation of Load Balancing Strategies”, National Conference on Emerging Technologies, 2004.
  2. Ali M.Alakeel, “A Fuzzy Dynamic Load Balancing Algorithm for Homogeneous Distributed Systems”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol.6, 2012.
  3. Ali M.Alakeel, “A Guide to Dynamic Load balancing in Distributed systems”, IJCSNS, vol.10 No.2, 2012.
  4. Asser and Charles, “Design, Implementation, and Performance of a Load Balancer for SIP Server Clusters”, IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, June 2012.
  5. Atul and Anil, “Portable Extended Cache Memory to Reduce Web Traffic”, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol.2 No.9 2010.
  6. Atul and Dimple, “A Comparison and Analysis of Various Extended Techniques of Query Optimization”, IJICT vol.3 No.3, 2012.
  7. B. Narendran, Sampath Rangarajan, and Shalini Yajnik, “Data distribution algorithms for load balanced fault-tolerant Web access”, In Proc. 16th IEEE Sympos. on Reliable Distributed Systems, pp 97–106, 1997.
  8. Bryhni, E. Klovning and O. Kure, “A Comparison of Load Balancing Techniques for Scalable Web Servers”, IEEE Network pp 58-63, July/August 2000.
  9. Cardellini, Colajanni, M., and Yu, “Dynamic load balancing on web-server systems”, IEEE Internet Computing vol.3 No.3 pp 28–39,1999
  10. Daniel and Anthony, “Algorithmic Mechanism Design for Load balancing in Distributed Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics”, vol.34, No.1, 2004.
  11. Dimple Juneja and Atul Gar, “Collective Intelligence based Framework for Load Balancing of Web Servers”, IJICT, vol. 3 No.1, 2012.
  12. Eager, D.L, E.Lazowska and J. Zahorjan, “Adaptive load sharing in homogeneous distributed systems”, IEEE Trans. Software Eng. vol.12 pp 662-673, 1986.
  13. F. Arlitt and C. L. Williamson, “Internet Web Servers: Workload Characterization and Performance Implications”, IEEE Trans. Networking vol.5 No. 5 pp 631-645, 1997.
  14. Gaochao Xu, Junjie Pang, and Xiaodong Fu, “A Load Balancing Model Based on Cloud Partitioning for the Public Cloud”, TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, vol.18, no.1, February 2013.
  15. H.C. Lin and C.S. Raghavendra, “A Dynamic Load- Balancing Policy with a Central Job Dispatcher (LBC)”, IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering vol.18 No.2 pp148-158, 1992.
  16. K.Salah, P.Calyam and M.I.Buhari , “Assessing Readiness of IP Networks to Support Desktop Videoconferencing Using OPNET”, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, November 2008.
  17. Manju Sharma and Manoj, “Comparative Investigation on Throughput and Client Response Time for a Switched and Routed Wireless LAN based on OPNET”, Proceedings of National Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing and Communication (ETCC-07), pp 436-440, 2007.
  18. Manju Sharma, Manoj Kumar and Ajay K.Sharma, “HTTP and FTP Statistics for Wireless and Wire-line Network with and without Load Balance based on OPNET”, IJISS, vol.5, no.1, p 112-125 , 2008.
  19. Mayank & Atul, “Comparative Survey of Load Balancing Algorithms in Cloud Computing Environment”, IJDCC, vol.1, No.2, 2013.
  20. Mohsen & Hossein Delda, “Balancing Load in a Computational Grid Applying Adaptive, Intelligent Colonies of Ants”, Informatica 32, pp 327–335, 2008.
  21. Payal and Atul, “A Comparative study of Static and Dynamic Load Balancing Algorithms”, International journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, Vol.2 No.12, Dec 2014.
  22. Ritika and Harjot, “Load Balancing Techniques using Mobile Agents”, IPASJ-IIJCS, vol.2, no.12, 2014.
  23. Santosh Kumar and Vikram Singh, “Load Balancing in Distributed Systems”, IJRREST, vol.1, no.2, September 2012.
  24. Suriya and Prashanth, “Review of load balancing in cloud computing”, IJCS, vol.10, no.1, Jan 2013.
  25. . Lan and T.YU, “A Dynamic Central Scheduler Load Balancing Mechanism”, Proc. of 14th IEEE Conf. on Computers and Communications, 1995.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Completely-Distributed Semi-Distributed OPNET FTP IP TCP.