CFP last date
22 July 2024
Call for Paper
August Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming August edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 22 July 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
Reseach Article

A Newly Proposed HIS Implementation Success Model for Nursing, using an Electronic Approach for Design

by Shahab Rezaian, Harhodin Bin Selamat, Reza Malekzadeh, Rasimah CheMohd Yusoff
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 141 - Number 2
Year of Publication: 2016
Authors: Shahab Rezaian, Harhodin Bin Selamat, Reza Malekzadeh, Rasimah CheMohd Yusoff

Shahab Rezaian, Harhodin Bin Selamat, Reza Malekzadeh, Rasimah CheMohd Yusoff . A Newly Proposed HIS Implementation Success Model for Nursing, using an Electronic Approach for Design. International Journal of Computer Applications. 141, 2 ( May 2016), 30-36. DOI=10.5120/ijca2016909557

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2016909557,
author = { Shahab Rezaian, Harhodin Bin Selamat, Reza Malekzadeh, Rasimah CheMohd Yusoff },
title = { A Newly Proposed HIS Implementation Success Model for Nursing, using an Electronic Approach for Design },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { May 2016 },
volume = { 141 },
number = { 2 },
month = { May },
year = { 2016 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 30-36 },
numpages = {9},
url = { },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2016909557 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T23:42:26.944245+05:30
%A Shahab Rezaian
%A Harhodin Bin Selamat
%A Reza Malekzadeh
%A Rasimah CheMohd Yusoff
%T A Newly Proposed HIS Implementation Success Model for Nursing, using an Electronic Approach for Design
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 141
%N 2
%P 30-36
%D 2016
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA

Despite the advantages of utilizing hospital information systems (HISs) in nursing care, and their contribution to nursing structures and care processes, the troubling issue of HIS underutilization continues. Low utilization of installed systems has been identified as a major problem in implementing information technology (IT). Unfortunately, nurses have been unwilling to apply technology to healthcare delivery, although they generally have a positive attitude toward computers. In this study, based on the Critical Success Factos (CSFs) and DeLone and McLean's Information Systems success model, an implementation framework, made up of essential elements to guide successful HIS implementation for nursing staff is proposed. This study is among the few that have tested empirically an implementation framework in the developing countries settings, and provides helpful guidelines for hospital managers in planning HIs implementation in such countries.

  1. Gable, G., Sedera, D., and Chan, T. 2003. Enterprise systems success: a measurement model. ICIS 2003 Proceedings. 48.
  2. Petter, S., DeLone, W., and McLean, E. 2008. Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European journal of information systems. 17 236-263.
  3. Delone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems. 19 9-30.
  4. Malik, M. A. and Khan, H. R. 2009. Understanding the implementation of an electronic hospital information system in a developing country: a case study from Pakistan. Proceedings of the Third Australasian Workshop on Health Informatics and Knowledge Management-Volume 97.
  5. ALTUWAIJRI, M. 2012. Health Information Technology Strategic Planning Alignment in Saudi Hospitals: A Historical Perspective. Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries. 5
  6. Khalifa, M. 2014. Technical and Human Challenges of Implementing Hospital Information Systems in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries. 8
  7. Cimino, J. J. and Shortliffe, E. H. 2006 Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine (Health Informatics). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
  8. Escobar-Rodríguez, T. and Bartual-Sopena, L. 2014. Impact of cultural factors on attitude toward using ERP systems in public hospitals. Revista de Contabilidad.
  9. Herwartz, H. and Strumann, C. 2014. Hospital efficiency under prospective reimbursement schemes: an empirical assessment for the case of Germany. The European Journal of Health Economics. 15 175-186.
  10. Pizzini, M. J. 2006. The relation between cost-system design, managers’ evaluations of the relevance and usefulness of cost data, and financial performance: an empirical study of US hospitals. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 31 179-210.
  11. Roham, M., Gabrielyan, A. R., and Archer, N. P. 2012. Predicting the impact of hospital health information technology adoption on patient satisfaction. Artificial intelligence in medicine. 56 123-135.
  12. Tabibi, S. J., Nasiripour, A. A., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Farhangi, A. A., and Ebrahimi, P. 2011. Effective Factors on Hospital Information System Acceptance: A Confirmatory Study in Iranian Hospitals. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research. 9 95-101.
  13. Brailer, D. J. 2005. Interoperability: the key to the future health care system. HEALTH AFFAIRS-MILLWOOD VA THEN BETHESDA MA-. 24 W5.
  14. Detmer, D., Bloomrosen, M., Raymond, B., and Tang, P. 2008. Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 8 45.
  15. Epping-Jordan, J., Pruitt, S., Bengoa, R., and Wagner, E. 2004. Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. Quality and safety in health care. 13 299-305.
  16. Girosi, F., Meili, R. C., and Scoville, R. 2005 Extrapolating evidence of health information technology savings and costs. Rand Corporation.
  17. Nagle, L. and Catford, P. 2007. Toward a model of successful electronic health record adoption. Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.). 11 84-91.
  18. Eslami, S., de Keizer, N. F., and Abu-Hanna, A. 2008. The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients—a systematic review. International journal of medical informatics. 77 365-376.
  19. Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., and Nykänen, P. 2008. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. International journal of medical informatics. 77 291-304.
  20. Koppel, R., Metlay, J. P., Cohen, A., Abaluck, B., Localio, A. R., Kimmel, S. E., and Strom, B. L. 2005. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. Jama. 293 1197-1203.
  21. King, W. J., Paice, N., Rangrej, J., Forestell, G. J., and Swartz, R. 2003. The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics. 112 506-509.
  22. Reckmann, M. H., Westbrook, J. I., Koh, Y., Lo, C., and Day, R. O. 2009. Does computerized provider order entry reduce prescribing errors for hospital inpatients? A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 16 613-623.
  23. Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., Maglione, M., Mojica, W., Roth, E., Morton, S. C., and Shekelle, P. G. 2006. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of internal medicine. 144 742-752.
  24. Messner, E. R. 2005. Quality of care and patient satisfaction: The improvement efforts of one emergency department. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal. 27 132-141.
  25. Young, G. J., Meterko, M., and Desai, K. R. 2000. Patient satisfaction with hospital care: effects of demographic and institutional characteristics. Medical care. 38 325-334.
  26. Hung, S.-Y., Ku, Y.-C., and Chien, J.-C. 2012. Understanding physicians’ acceptance of the Medline system for practicing evidence-based medicine: a decomposed TPB model. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 81 130-142.
  27. Ammenwerth, E., Rauchegger, F., Ehlers, F., Hirsch, B., and Schaubmayr, C. 2011. Effect of a nursing information system on the quality of information processing in nursing: An evaluation study using the HIS-monitor instrument. International journal of medical informatics. 80 25-38.
  28. Mäenpää, T., Suominen, T., Asikainen, P., Maass, M., and Rostila, I. 2009. The outcomes of regional healthcare information systems in health care: a review of the research literature. International journal of medical informatics. 78 757-771.
  29. Donati, A., Gabbanelli, V., Pantanetti, S., Carletti, P., Principi, T., Marini, B., Nataloni, S., Sambo, G., and Pelaia, P. 2008. The impact of a clinical information system in an intensive care unit. Journal of clinical monitoring and computing. 22 31-36.
  30. Bosman, R. 2009. Impact of computerized information systems on workload in operating room and intensive care unit. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 23 15-26.
  31. Chang, J., Poynton, M. R., Gassert, C. A., and Staggers, N. 2011. Nursing informatics competencies required of nurses in Taiwan. International journal of medical informatics. 80 332-340.
  32. Mahler, C., Ammenwerth, E., Wagner, A., Tautz, A., Happek, T., Hoppe, B., and Eichstädter, R. 2007. Effects of a computer-based nursing documentation system on the quality of nursing documentation. Journal of Medical Systems. 31 274-282.
  33. Wickramasinghe, N. and Goldberg, S. 2008. Critical Success Factors for Delivering M-Health Excellence. Encyclopedia of Healthcare Information Systems. 1
  34. Parker, M. E. and Smith, M. C. 2010 Nursing theories & nursing practice. FA Davis.
  35. Hsiao, S.-J., Li, Y.-C., Chen, Y.-L., and Ko, H.-C. 2009. Critical factors for the adoption of mobile nursing information systems in Taiwan: the nursing department administrators’ perspective. Journal of medical systems. 33 369-377.
  36. Ellahi, A. and Manarvi, I. 2010. Understanding Attitudes Towards Computer Use in the Police Department of Pakistan. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries. 42
  37. Bernstein, M. L., McCreless, T., and Cote, M. J. 2007. Five constants of information technology adoption in healthcare. Hospital Topics. 85 17-25.
  38. Abedini, S., Takhti, H. K., and Abedini, S. 2011. Assessing nursing curriculum: Graduate nurse viewpoints. Physiology. 13 20.26.
  39. Konstantinidis, G., Anastassopoulos, G. C., Karakos, A. S., Anagnostou, E., and Danielides, V. 2012. A user-centered, object-oriented methodology for developing health information systems: a Clinical Information System (CIS) example. Journal of medical systems. 36 437-450.
  40. Zhang, H., Cocosila, M., and Archer, N. 2010. Factors of adoption of mobile information technology by homecare nurses: a technology acceptance model 2 approach. Computers Informatics Nursing. 28 49-56.
  41. Abdrbo, A. A., Hudak, C. A., Anthony, M. K., and Douglas, S. L. 2011. Information systems use, benefits, and satisfaction among Ohio RNs. Computers Informatics Nursing. 29 59-65.
  42. Huryk, L. A. 2010. Factors influencing nurses’ attitudes towards healthcare information technology. Journal of Nursing Management. 18 606-612.
  43. Kaya, N. 2011. Factors affecting nurses' attitudes toward computers in healthcare. Computers Informatics Nursing. 29 121-129.
  44. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975 Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
  45. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly. 319-340.
  46. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly. 425-478.
  47. Ajzen, I. 1985 From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Springer.
  48. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. 1995. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research. 6 144-176.
  49. Polit, D. F. and Beck, C. T. 2006. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health. 29 489-497.
  50. Polit, D. F. and Beck, C. T. 2004 Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  51. Grant, J. S. and Davis, L. L. 1997. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in nursing & health. 20 269-274.
  52. Sittig, D. F., Hazlehurst, B. L., Palen, T., Hsu, J., Jimison, H., and Hornbrook, M. 2002. Clinical information system research agenda for kaiser permanente. Permanente J. 6
  53. Kaplan, B. and Shaw, N. 2004. Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational, and social issues. Methods of Information in Medicine-Methodik der Information in der Medizin. 43 215-231.
  54. Baus, A. 2004. Literature review: barriers to the successful implementation of healthcare information systems. Office of Health Services Research, West Virginia University Department of Community Medicine, Morgantown, WV.
  55. Wager, K. A., Lee, F. W., White, A. W., Ward, D. M., and Ornstein, S. M. 2000. Impact of an electronic medical record system on community-based primary care practices. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 13 338-348.
  56. Vafaee, A., Vahedian, M., Esmaeily, H., and Kimiafar, K. 2010. Views of users towards the quality of hospital information system in training hospitals. Journal of research in health sciences. 10 47-53.
  57. Heller, E. E. 1995. The computer-based patient record vision contrasted with HIS/MIS. International journal of bio-medical computing. 39 19-23.
  58. Abrahamsen, C. 2003. Patient safety: take the informatics challenge. Nursing management. 34 48-51.
  59. Bradley, C. 2003. Technology as a catalyst to transforming nursing care. Nursing outlook. 51 S14-S15.
  60. Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Duyck, W., van Braak, J., Sijnave, B., and Duyck, P. 2012. Do hospital physicians’ attitudes change during PACS implementation? A cross-sectional acceptance study. International journal of medical informatics. 81 88-97.
  61. Ismail, N. I., Abdullah, N. H., Shamsudin, A., and Ariffin, N. A. N. 2013. Implementation differences of hospital information system (HIS) in Malaysian public hospitals. Technology. 20 22.
  62. Lee, H. W., Ramayah, T., and Zakaria, N. 2012. External factors in hospital information system (HIS) adoption model: a case on malaysia. Journal of medical systems. 36 2129-2140.
  63. Lorenzi, N. M., Kouroubali, A., Detmer, D. E., and Bloomrosen, M. 2009. How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 9 15.
  64. Khalifa, M. 2013. Barriers to health information systems and electronic medical records implementation. A field study of Saudi Arabian hospitals. Procedia Computer Science. 21 335-342.
  65. w Creswell, J. 2009 Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
  66. Cavana, R., Delahaye, B. L., and Sekeran, U. 2001 Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. John Wiley & Sons Australia.
  67. Zikmund, W. G. 2003. Sample designs and sampling procedures. Business research methods. 7 368-400.
  68. Ridder, H.-G. and Yin R. K. 2012. Case Study Research. Design and Methods 4 th ed. 2012, Rainer Hampp Verlag.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences


Hospital Information System Success model Information culture Organization culture trust developing countries.