CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Multi-Band Transceiver for Tracking Application

by Amit Naik, K. Krishna Naik
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 183 - Number 12
Year of Publication: 2021
Authors: Amit Naik, K. Krishna Naik
10.5120/ijca2021921430

Amit Naik, K. Krishna Naik . Multi-Band Transceiver for Tracking Application. International Journal of Computer Applications. 183, 12 ( Jun 2021), 30-33. DOI=10.5120/ijca2021921430

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2021921430,
author = { Amit Naik, K. Krishna Naik },
title = { Multi-Band Transceiver for Tracking Application },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Jun 2021 },
volume = { 183 },
number = { 12 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2021 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 30-33 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume183/number12/31981-2021921430/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2021921430 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:16:37.899567+05:30
%A Amit Naik
%A K. Krishna Naik
%T Multi-Band Transceiver for Tracking Application
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 183
%N 12
%P 30-33
%D 2021
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Conventional Transceivers are designed using particular wireless technology and thus works in a specified range. This paper presents data transmission over Encrypted Multiband Transceivers which makes use of different wireless communication technologies, Encryption and GPS is used to securely communicate an image or other kinds of digital information with efficiency. It uses dynamic switching which is depending upon the distance, network, receiver sensitivity etc. Transceiver communication protocols are discussed with the help of software implementation and their algorithms.

References
  1. J. Ryynanen, S. Lindfors, K. Stadius and K. A. I. Halonen, "Integrated circuits for multiband multimode receivers," in IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 5-16, 2006.
  2. A.Naik and K.K. Naik “Handover in multiband Transceiver,”2016 International Conference on ICT in Business Industry and Government(ICTBIG),Indore 2016,pp1-4.dio:10.1109/ICTBIG.2016.7892654 .
  3. Bo Su and Li Wang, "Application of Proteus virtual system modelling (VSM) in teaching of microcontroller," 2010 International Conference on E-Health Networking Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (EDT), Shenzhen, 2010, pp. 375-378.
  4. Z. Yong-Xia and Z. Ge, "MD5 Research," 2010 Second International Conference on Multimedia and Information Technology, Kaifeng, 2010, pp. 271-273.doi: 10.1109/MMIT.2010.186
  5. K. Dhinakaran, S. Srinath, S. Sriram and R. Venkateshwar, "GPS based tracking system for transit objects," 2017 Third International Conference on Science Technology Engineering & Management (ICONSTEM), Chennai, 2017, pp. 194-201.
  6. Annual report of ICT (Information and communication Technology) facts and figures 2017.
  7. Press Release No. 43/2017 of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI).
  8. M. Ismail, M. Kashef, E. Serpedin and K. Qaraqe, "On balancing energy efficiency for network operators and mobile users in dynamic planning," in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 158-165, November 2015.
  9. M. Polese, M. Giordani, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan and M. Zorzi, "Improved Handover Through Dual Connectivity in 5G mmWave Mobile Networks," in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2069-2084, Sept. 2017.
  10. M. Biagi, F. Cuomo, M. Perri and A. Irjoob, "A Multi-Layer Parametric Approach to Maximize the Access Probability of Mobile Networks," in IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 6692-6703, 2016.
  11. Sagar Shriram Salwe, K. Krishna Naik, “Discrete Image Data Transmission in Heterogeneous Wireless Network using Vertical Handover Mechanism," IET Image Processing vol.11 no.7, pp.550-558, 2017. DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2016.0779.
  12. Sagar Shriram Salwe, K. Krishna Naik, “Heterogeneous Wireless Networks for IoT Applications," IETE Technical Review pp.1-8, 2017.DOI:10.1080/02564602.2017.1400412.
  13. J. Lee, Y. Su and C. Shen, "A Comparative Study of Wireless Protocols: Bluetooth, UWB, ZigBee, and Wi-Fi," IECON 2007 - 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society,Taipei,2007,pp.46-51.doi:10.1109/IECON.2007.4460126.
  14. Karunakar Pothuganti and Anusha Chitneni “A Comparative Study of wireless Protocols:Bluetooth ,UWB,ZigBee and Wi-Fi”Advance in Electronic and Electric Engineering,ISSN 2231-1297,volume 4,number 6(2014),pp 655-662.
  15. E. Ferro and F. Potorti, “Bluetooth and Wi-Fi wireless protocols: A survey and a comparison,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 12-16, Feb. 2005.
  16. X. Wang, Y. Ren, J. Zhao, Z. Guo, and R. Yao, “Comparison of IEEE 802.11e and IEEE 802.15.3 MAC,” in Proc. IEEE CAS Symp. Emerging Technologies: Mobile & Wireless Commun, Shanghai, China, May, 2004, pp. 675-680.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Bluetooth Transceiver WLAN ZigBee