CFP last date
20 May 2024
Reseach Article

Application of GeoGebra to Improve Academic Performance of Students in Geometry

by Emmanuel K. Ansong, Daniel Asomani Wiafe, Richard Amankwah
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 183 - Number 29
Year of Publication: 2021
Authors: Emmanuel K. Ansong, Daniel Asomani Wiafe, Richard Amankwah
10.5120/ijca2021921671

Emmanuel K. Ansong, Daniel Asomani Wiafe, Richard Amankwah . Application of GeoGebra to Improve Academic Performance of Students in Geometry. International Journal of Computer Applications. 183, 29 ( Oct 2021), 26-32. DOI=10.5120/ijca2021921671

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2021921671,
author = { Emmanuel K. Ansong, Daniel Asomani Wiafe, Richard Amankwah },
title = { Application of GeoGebra to Improve Academic Performance of Students in Geometry },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Oct 2021 },
volume = { 183 },
number = { 29 },
month = { Oct },
year = { 2021 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 26-32 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume183/number29/32114-2021921671/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2021921671 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:18:13.879816+05:30
%A Emmanuel K. Ansong
%A Daniel Asomani Wiafe
%A Richard Amankwah
%T Application of GeoGebra to Improve Academic Performance of Students in Geometry
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 183
%N 29
%P 26-32
%D 2021
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Students’ performance in Geometry has been a source of worry to both teachers and students at the colleges of Education in Ghana. This is because the existing approach of teaching the afore-mentioned course has been chalk and talk (Traditional), which do not promote effective understanding. Thus, this study seeks to propose teaching according to Van Hiele theory of geometrical understanding using GeoGebra to address this gap. A sample of 390 level 100 students was selected purposively from a population of 490 level 100 students for the study. The main instrument for data collection was test. Data collected from the test were analyzed and presented by the independent sample t –test. Two tailed test was used in the descriptive statistics to test the null hypothesis. The reliability coefficient for the pre-test was 0.66 and that of the post-test was 0.65 indicating the instruments were accurate and reliable. The findings showed that there was significant difference between the mean score of students who were taught Geometry using GeoGebra and those taught without the use of GeoGebra in favor of the GeoGebra group. The study recommended among others that enough mathematics software especially GeoGebra should be provided in schools.

References
  1. A. Heinze and K. Reiss, "Mistake-handling activities in the mathematics classroom: Effects of an in-service teacher training on students’ performance in geometry," in Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2007, pp. 9-16.
  2. D. De Bock, L. Verschaffel, D. Janssens, W. Van Dooren, and K. Claes, "Do realistic contexts and graphical representations always have a beneficial impact on students’ performance? Negative evidence from a study on modelling non-linear geometry problems," Learning and instruction, vol. 13, pp. 441-463, 2003.
  3. M. Pittalis, N. Mousoulides, and C. Christou, "Spatial ability as a predictor of students’ performance in geometry," in Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Educations (CERME 5), 2007, pp. 1072-1081.
  4. R. A. Saha, A. F. M. Ayub, and R. A. Tarmizi, "The effects of GeoGebra on mathematics achievement: enlightening coordinate geometry learning," Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 686-693, 2010.
  5. M. K. Tay and T. M. Wonkyi, "Effect of using Geogebra on senior high school students’ performance in circle theorems," African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, vol. 14, pp. 1-18, 2018.
  6. M. J. Kintu, C. Zhu, and E. Kagambe, "Learner satisfaction and knowledge construction in blended learning," in 11th annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED), 2017, pp. 5443-5450.
  7. M. J. Kintu, C. Zhu, and E. Kagambe, "Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes," International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 14, pp. 1-20, 2017.
  8. R. Eyyam and H. S. Yaratan, "Impact of use of technology in mathematics lessons on student achievement and attitudes," Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, vol. 42, pp. 31S-42S, 2014.
  9. J. Pryor and J. G. Ampiah, "Listening to voices in the village: Collaborating through data chains," Decolonizing research in cross-cultural contexts: Critical personal narratives, pp. 159-78, 2004.
  10. I. Pinamang and P. O. Cofie, "Pre-service teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in teaching geometric transformation," African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, vol. 13, pp. 63-70, 2017.
  11. T. Shah, M. A. Patel, and H. Shah, "A comparative study on the teaching effectiveness of chalk & talk versus Microsoft PowerPoint presentation-An institution based pilot study of physiotherapy students," Int J Cur Res Rev, vol. 9, pp. 40-43, 2017.
  12. R. V. Kedare, R. Kharat, and R. Wagh, "Impact of PowerPoint and Chalkboard teaching in Physiotherapy Undergraduates," International Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Research, pp. 9-11, 2019.
  13. S. N. A. S. Zamri and E. Zakaria, "Conceptual and procedural knowledge: An effectiveness study on GeoGebra software," Advanced Science Letters, vol. 23, pp. 2079-2082, 2017.
  14. R. Noreen and A. M. K. Rana, "Activity-Based Teaching versus Traditional Method of Teaching in Mathematics at Elementary Level," Bulletin of Education and Research, vol. 41, pp. 145-159, 2019.
  15. D. T. Tollu, Y. Yazlik, and N. Taskara, "On the solutions of two special types of Riccati difference equation via Fibonacci numbers," Advances in Difference Equations, vol. 2013, pp. 1-7, 2013.
  16. A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, T. A. Brush, J. Strycker, S. Gronseth, T. Roman, S. Abaci, et al., "Preparation versus practice: How do teacher education programs and practicing teachers align in their use of technology to support teaching and learning?," Computers & Education, vol. 59, pp. 399-411, 2012.
  17. C. Dede, "Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning," in International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, ed: Springer, 2008, pp. 43-62.
  18. M. Schweisfurth, "Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem?," International Journal of Educational Development, vol. 31, pp. 425-432, 2011.
  19. J. Mayberry, "The van Hiele levels of geometric thought in undergraduate preservice teachers," Journal for research in mathematics education, vol. 14, pp. 58-69, 1983.
  20. A. G. Manizade and M. Mason, "Choosing Geogebra Applications Most Appropriate For Teacher’s Current Geometry Classroom: Pedagogical Perspective," in First North American GeoGebra Conference, 2010, p. 214.
  21. D. Simon, Optimal state estimation: Kalman, H infinity, and nonlinear approaches: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
  22. R. Castillo, E. Castillo, R. Guerra, V. E. Johnson, T. McPhail, A. K. Garg, et al., "A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets," Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 54, p. 1849, 2009.
  23. K. K. Bhagat and C.-Y. Chang, "Incorporating GeoGebra into Geometry learning-A lesson from India," Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, pp. 77-86, 2015.
  24. M. Dogan and R. İçel, "The role of dynamic geometry software in the process of learning: GeoGebra example about triangles," Journal of Human Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 1441-1458, 2011.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Van Hiele Theory GeoGebra Geometry