CFP last date
22 April 2024
Call for Paper
May Edition
IJCA solicits high quality original research papers for the upcoming May edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is 22 April 2024

Submit your paper
Know more
The week's pick
Responsive image
Enhancing Privacy Preservation: Multi-Attribute Protection with P-Sensitive K-Anonymity

Twinkle Patel Kiran Amin
Random Articles
Reseach Article

HPDDRR: Optimized Scheduler Shaper for Bandwidth Management and Traffic Shaping in Internet Protocol Storage Area Networks

by Kithinji Joseph, Makau S. Mutua, Gitonga D. Mwathi
journal cover thumbnail

International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 183 - Number 36
Year of Publication: 2021
Authors: Kithinji Joseph, Makau S. Mutua, Gitonga D. Mwathi
10.5120/ijca2021921746

Kithinji Joseph, Makau S. Mutua, Gitonga D. Mwathi . HPDDRR: Optimized Scheduler Shaper for Bandwidth Management and Traffic Shaping in Internet Protocol Storage Area Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications. 183, 36 ( Nov 2021), 20-32. DOI=10.5120/ijca2021921746

@article{ 10.5120/ijca2021921746,
author = { Kithinji Joseph, Makau S. Mutua, Gitonga D. Mwathi },
title = { HPDDRR: Optimized Scheduler Shaper for Bandwidth Management and Traffic Shaping in Internet Protocol Storage Area Networks },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { Nov 2021 },
volume = { 183 },
number = { 36 },
month = { Nov },
year = { 2021 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 20-32 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume183/number36/32163-2021921746/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijca2021921746 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-07T01:18:49.435328+05:30
%A Kithinji Joseph
%A Makau S. Mutua
%A Gitonga D. Mwathi
%T HPDDRR: Optimized Scheduler Shaper for Bandwidth Management and Traffic Shaping in Internet Protocol Storage Area Networks
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 183
%N 36
%P 20-32
%D 2021
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Providing QOS (quality of service) is a vital problem in storage area networks. In this paper a technique known as HPDDRR(hierarchical priority based dynamic deficit round robin) which is scheduler shaper that uses hit ration for flow prioritization and a dynamic quantum calculated based on the priority for scheduling is presented. Based on the applications used, packets may vary in sizes and belonging to different priority classes. To ensure that big low priority packets don’t delay small high priority packets this study uses hierarchical priority queues instead of FIFO (first in first out) queues for scheduling. This allows for performance isolation as well as resource sharing. The evaluation results proof that HPDDRR is able to optimize bandwidth utilization as well as latency for competing traffic flows under Service level objectives constraints.

References
  1. M. Karlsson, C. Karamanolis, and X. Zhu, “Triage: Performance Differentiation for Storage Systems Using Adaptive Control,” ACM Trans. Storage, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 457–480, 2005.
  2. X. Xuedong, “Research and Implementation of iSCSI-based SAN Static Data Encryption System,” pp. 257–260, 2012.
  3. M. A. L. I. Imran, “Incast Mitigation in a Data Center Storage Cluster Through a Dynamic Fair-Share Buffer Policy,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 10718–10733, 2019.
  4. M. B. P. Martins and W. L. Zucch, “FCo oE an d iSC SI Per rforma ance Analys sis in T Tape irtualiz zation n Syste ems,” vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 2372–2378, 2015.
  5. Y. Cui et al., “TailCutter: Wisely cutting tail latency in cloud CDNs under cost constraints,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1612–1628, 2019.
  6. V. Jaiman, S. Ben Mokhtar, V. Quéma, L. Y. Chen, and E. Rivière, “Héron: Taming tail latencies in key-value stores under heterogeneous workloads,” Proc. IEEE Symp. Reliab. Distrib. Syst., vol. 2019-Octob, pp. 191–200, 2019.
  7. Y. Peng and P. Varman, “BQueue: A coarse-grained bucket QoS scheduler,” Proc. - 18th IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. Clust. Cloud Grid Comput. CCGRID 2018, pp. 93–102, 2018.
  8. Y. Lu, D. H. C. Du, and T. Ruwart, “QoS provisioning framework for an OSD-based storage system,” Proc. - Twenty -second IEEE/Thirteenth NASA Goddard Conf. Mass Storage Syst. Technol., pp. 28–35, 2005.
  9. S. Sarmah and S. K. Sarma, “A Novel Approach to Prioritized Bandwidth Management in 802.11e WLAN,” 2019 IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Converg. Technol. I2CT 2019, pp. 1–5, 2019.
  10. J. L. Valenzuela, A. Monleon, I. San Esteban, M. Portoles, and O. Salient, “A hierarchical token bucket algorithm to enhance QoS in IEEE 802.11:Proposal, implementation and evaluation,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 2659–2662, 2004.
  11. D. Iswadi, R. Adriman, and R. Munadi, “Adaptive Switching PCQ-HTB Algorithms for Bandwidth Management in RouterOS,” Proc. Cybern. 2019 - 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Cybern. Comput. Intell. Towar. a Smart Human-Centered Cyber World, pp. 61–65, 2019.
  12. Garroppo, Rosario Giuseppe, et al. "The wireless hierarchical token bucket: a channel aware scheduler for 802.11 networks." Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks. IEEE, 2005.
  13. Y. Wang, F. Xu, Z. Chen, Y. Sun, and H. Zhang, “An Application-Level QoS Control Method Based on Local Bandwidth Scheduling,” vol. 2018, pp. 1–10, 2018.
  14. Z. Zhou, Y. Yan, M. Berger, and S. Ruepp, “Analysis and Modeling of Asynchronous TrafficShaping in Time Sensitive Networks,” 2018 14th IEEE Int. Work. Fact. Commun. Syst., pp. 1–4, 2018.
  15. C. H. Lee and Y. T. Kim, “QoS-aware hierarchical token bucket (QHTB) queuing disciplines for QoS-guaranteed Diffserv provisioning with optimized bandwidth utilization and priority-based preemption,” Int. Conf. Inf. Netw., pp. 351–358, 2013.
  16. W. M. Zuberek and D. Strzeciwilk, “Modeling Traffic Shaping and Traffic Policing in Packet-Switched Networks,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 75–81, 2018.
  17. A. Elgabli, A. Elghariani, V. Aggarwal, and M. Bell, “QoE-Aware Resource Allocation for Small Cells,” 2018 IEEE Glob. Commun. Conf., pp. 1–6, 2018.
  18. B. Wu, B. Wu, H. Yin, A. Liu, C. Liu, and F. Xing, “Investigation and System Implementation of Flexible Bandwidth Switching for a Software-Defined Space Information Network,” IEEE Photonics J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–14, 2017.
  19. M. Song, “Minimizing Power Consumption in Video Servers by the Combined Use of Solid-State Disks and Multi-Speed Disks,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 25737–25746, 2018.
  20. H. Guo, “A Dynamic and Adaptive Bandwidth Management Scheme for QoS Support in Wireless Multimedia Networks,” vol. 00, no. c, 2005.
  21. P. Ramaswamy, “PROVISIONING TASK BASED SYMMETRIC QoS IN iSCSI SAN,” no. December, 2008.
  22. F. Uff, “A Lightweight Reinforcement-Learning-Based Multitenant Data Center,” pp. 331–336, 2020.
  23. D. D. Chambliss, G. A. Alvarez, P. Pandey, D. Jadav, and T. P. L. Ý, “Performance virtualization for large-scale storage systems,” 2003.
  24. Y. Peng and P. Varman, “PTrans: A Scalable Algorithm for Reservation Guarantees in Distributed Systems,” Annu. ACM Symp. Parallelism Algorithms Archit., pp. 441–452, 2020.
  25. Y. Peng, Q. Liu, and P. Varman, “Scalable QoS for Distributed Storage Clusters using Dynamic Token Allocation,” IEEE Symp. Mass Storage Syst. Technol., vol. 2019-May, pp. 14–27, 2019.
  26. E. Micha and N. Shah, “Proportionally fair clustering revisited,” Leibniz Int. Proc. Informatics, LIPIcs, vol. 168, 2020.
  27. B. Siregar, A. Fadli, and A. Hizriadi, “Controlling of Quality of Service in Campus Area Network Using OpenDaylight with Hierarchical Token Bucket Method,” 7th Int. Conf. ICT Smart Soc. AIoT Smart Soc. ICISS 2020 - Proceeding, pp. 8–12, 2020.
  28. D. Iswadi, R. Adriman, and R. Munadi, “Adaptive Switching PCQ-HTB Algorithms for Bandwidth Management in RouterOS,” Proc. Cybern. 2019 - 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Cybern. Comput. Intell. Towar. a Smart Human-Centered Cyber World, pp. 61–65, 2019.
  29. K. Mathews, C. Kramer, and R. Gotzhein, “Token bucket based traffic shaping and monitoring for WLAN-based control systems,” IEEE Int. Symp. Pers. Indoor Mob. Radio Commun. PIMRC, vol. 2017-Octob, pp. 1–7, 2018.
  30. D. Iswadi, “Adaptive Switching PCQ-HTB Algorithms for Bandwidth Management in RouterOS,” pp. 61–65, 2019.
  31. Y. Qian et al., “A configurable rule based classful token bucket filter network request scheduler for the lustre file system,” Proc. Int. Conf. High Perform. Comput. Networking, Storage Anal. SC 2017, 2017.
  32. Sarmah, Satyajit, and Shikhar Kumar Sarma. "A novel approach to prioritized bandwidth management in 802.11 e WLAN." 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT). IEEE, 2019.
  33. S. Ren, Q. Feng, and W. Dou, “An end-to-end qos routing on software defined network based on hierarchical token bucket queuing discipline,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., vol. Part F1287, pp. 0–4, 2017.
  34. B. Siregar, A. Fadli, and A. Hizriadi, “Controlling of Quality of Service in Campus Area Network Using OpenDaylight with Hierarchical Token Bucket Method,” 7th Int. Conf. ICT Smart Soc. AIoT Smart Soc. ICISS 2020 - Proceeding, pp. 1–5, 2020.
  35. W. Aljoby, X. Wang, T. Z. J. Fu, and R. T. B. Ma, “On SDN-enabled online and dynamic bandwidth allocation for stream analytics,” arXiv, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1688–1702, 2018.
  36. Valenzuela, Jose Luis, et al. "A hierarchical token bucket algorithm to enhance QoS in IEEE 802.11: proposal, implementation and evaluation." IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004. Vol. 4. IEEE, 2004.
  37. S. Ren, “A Service Curve of Hierarchical Token Bucket Queue Discipline on Soft-Ware Defined Networks Based on Deterministic Network Calculus: An Analysis and Simulation,” J. Adv. Comput. Networks, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2017.
  38. A. N. Sanyoto, D. Perdana, and G. Bisono, “Performance Evaluation of Round Robin and Proportional Fair Scheduling Algorithm on 5G Milimeter Wave Network for Node Density Scenarios,” Int. J. Simul. Syst. Sci. Technol., pp. 1–6, 2019.
  39. A. B. Mathews and G. Glandevadhas, “Improved Proportional Fair Algorithm for Transportation of 5G Signals in Internet of Medical Things,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1810–1814, 2020.
  40. M. Saunders, P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill, Research for business students fifth edition,Pearson Education,2009. .
  41. Greener S. Business Research Methods.[e-book] Dr. Sue Greener and Ventus Publishing ApS. Available through:< http://www. bookbon. com>[Accessed 9 May 2011]. 2008.
  42. Winterton J. Business Research Methods ALAN BRYMAN and EMMA BELL. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. xxxii+ 786 pp.£ 34.99 (pbk). ISBN 9780199284986. Management Learning. 2008 Nov;39(5):628-32.
  43. I. Guo, N. Langrené, G. Loeper, and W. Ning, “Robust utility maximization under model uncertainty via a penalization approach,” Math. Financ. Econ., no. 2013, pp. 1–33, 2021.
  44. L. Vigneri, G. Paschos, and P. Mertikopoulos, “Large-Scale Network Utility Maximization: Countering Exponential Growth with Exponentiated Gradients,” Proc. - IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 2019-April, pp. 1630–1638, 2019.
  45. Y. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Cui, K. G. Shin, and Z. Zhang, “Distributed Packet Forwarding and Caching Based on Stochastic Network Utility Maximization,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1264–1277, 2018.
  46. F. Zhang, R. Deng, and H. Liang, “An Optimal Real-Time Distributed Algorithm for Utility Maximization of Mobile Ad Hoc Cloud,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 824–827, 2018.
  47. L. Gu et al., “Fairness-Aware Dynamic Rate Control and Flow Scheduling for Network Utility Maximization in Network Service Chain,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1059–1071, 2019.
  48. L. Leonardi, L. Lo Bello, and S. Aglianò, “Priority-based bandwidth management in virtualized software-defined networks,” Electron., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1–21, 2020.
  49. A. Gulati, G. Shanmuganathan, X. Zhang, and P. Varman, “Demand based hierarchical QoS using storage resource pools,” Proc. 2012 USENIX Annu. Tech. Conf. USENIX ATC 2012, pp. 1–13, 2019.
  50. J, Lee E, Noh SH. I/O Schedulers for Proportionality and Stability on Flash-Based SSDs in Multi-Tenant Environments. IEEE Access. 2019 Dec 30;8:4451-65.
  51. Wachs, Matthew, Michael Abd-El-Malek, Eno Thereska, and Gregory R. Ganger. "Argon: Performance Insulation for Shared Storage Servers." In FAST, vol. 7, pp. 5-5. 2007.
  52. Wu, Joel C., and Scott A. Brandt. "The design and implementation of AQuA: an adaptive quality of service aware object-based storage device." In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE/14th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, pp. 209-218. 2006.
  53. Li N, Jiang H, Feng D, Shi Z. Pslo: Enforcing the xth percentile latency and throughput slos for consolidated vm storage. InProceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on Computer Systems 2016,pp. 1-14.
  54. Y. Peng, “Latency Fairness Scheduling for Shared Storage Systems,” 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Networking, Archit. Storage, pp. 1–8.
  55. Wong, Theodore M., Richard A. Golding, Caixue Lin, and Ralph A. Becker-Szendy. "Zygaria: Storage performance as a managed resource." In 12th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS'06), pp. 125-134. IEEE, 2006.
  56. Gulati, Ajay, Irfan Ahmad, and Carl A. Waldspurger. "PARDA: Proportional Allocation of Resources for Distributed Storage Access." FAST. Vol. 9. 2009.
  57. 
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Dynamic Bandwidth management Burst Handling ISCSI IP SAN Quantum Policing.

Powered by PhDFocusTM