CFP last date
20 June 2024
Reseach Article

Ontology Driven Benchmarking on ITIL to achieve Six Sigma

by Sanket Dash
International Journal of Computer Applications
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 42 - Number 19
Year of Publication: 2012
Authors: Sanket Dash
10.5120/5798-7826

Sanket Dash . Ontology Driven Benchmarking on ITIL to achieve Six Sigma. International Journal of Computer Applications. 42, 19 ( March 2012), 1-7. DOI=10.5120/5798-7826

@article{ 10.5120/5798-7826,
author = { Sanket Dash },
title = { Ontology Driven Benchmarking on ITIL to achieve Six Sigma },
journal = { International Journal of Computer Applications },
issue_date = { March 2012 },
volume = { 42 },
number = { 19 },
month = { March },
year = { 2012 },
issn = { 0975-8887 },
pages = { 1-7 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://ijcaonline.org/archives/volume42/number19/5798-7826/ },
doi = { 10.5120/5798-7826 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2024-02-06T20:31:42.307997+05:30
%A Sanket Dash
%T Ontology Driven Benchmarking on ITIL to achieve Six Sigma
%J International Journal of Computer Applications
%@ 0975-8887
%V 42
%N 19
%P 1-7
%D 2012
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Benchmarking helps in organizational gap analysis by comparing it with some predefined standard bench marks which instead allow process's system, capability to increase to the maximum level. Conglomerated with Ontology, it provides a source of precisely defined terms that can create a consensus of shared understanding concerning the domain of discourse pertaining to a certain domain of knowledge. With a contentious focus on the gap analysis accurate measures can be planned or maximum efficiency. In this context the Combined benefits of Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) for IT Service Management and Six Sigma defining a process improvement approach when adds to the bes usage of ontology driven benchmarking ensures a quality improvement strategy reducing operational costs to ensure bottom-line improvements. To add practicality to this operational issue of a service life cycle stage – Continual Service Improvement (CSI) is taken for consideration in order to measure and improve processes and services.

References
  1. Study and analysis of control phase role for increasing the Success of six sigma projects Yousef Gholipour Kanani, 1-4244-0148-8/06IEEE
  2. Six Sigma for IT Service Management, SixSigmaZone. com
  3. An Overview of the Adoption of IT Governance Models and Software Process Quality Instruments at Brazil - Preliminary Results of a Survey- Rodrigo Santos de Espindola, Edimara Mezzomo Luciano, Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy, Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences – 2009
  4. Software Process Standardization for Distributed Working Groups Carmen Maidantchik, Ana Regina C. Rocha and Geraldo Xex´eo COPPE - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  5. SOFTWARE PROCESS THEMES AND ISSUES ,Mark Dowson, Marlstone Software Technology Inc 0-8186-3600-9/93 1993 IEEE
  6. SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STANDARDS: Challenges for Process Assurance R. Craig Smith Motorola, Inc. 1082-3670/97 1997 IEEE
  7. White paper: Combining ITIL and Six Sigma to improve Information Technology Service Management at General Electric
  8. A Methodology and its Support Environment for Benchmark-based Adaptable Software Process Improvement , Wu Minghui,'k'ing Jing,Yu Chunyan , 2004 IEEE international Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
  9. Y. Wang, G. King, "A New Approach to Benchmark-Based Process Improvement", Proceedings of European Software Process Improvement 2000, Copenhagen, pp. 140-149, Nov. 2000.
  10. Waxer (2006), Six Sigma costs and savings Aug2009 . http://www. isixsigma. com
  11. Hunter, D. ; B. Schmidt, Six sigma: benefits and approaches, Chemical Week, 161, 37, 35-36, 1999.
  12. Murugappan, M. ; Keeni, G. , Quality improvement: the Six Sigma way, 2000, Proc. Of Asia Pacific Conference Quality Software, IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, 248–257.
  13. Marash, S. A. , Six Sigma: business results though innovation, 2000, Proc of the 54th Annual Quality Congress of the American Society for Quality, Indianapolis 627–630.
  14. Harry, M. , Schroeder, H. , Six Sigma: a breakthrough strategy for profitability, Quality Progress. 31, 5 1998.
  15. Blakeslee Jr. , J. A. , 1999, Achieving quantum leaps in quality and competitiveness: implementing the Six Sigma solution in your company, Proc. Of THE 53TH ANNUAL QUALITY CONGRESS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR QUALITY, Anaheim: Califórnia, 486–496.
  16. Biehl, R. E. , Six Sigma for software, Quality time, IEEE Software, 21, 2, 68-70, 2004.
  17. SW-DMAIC: A SIX SIGMA NEW GENERATION FOR IMPROVING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES, A. C. Tonini, F. J. B. Laurindo, M. M. Spínola , 19th International Conference on Production Research
  18. Research on the Application of Six Sigma in Software Process Improvement, ZHAO Xiaosong, HE Zhen, GUI Fangfang, ZHANG Shenqing, International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing.
  19. T. R. Gruber. Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. In Roberto Poli Nicola Guarino, editor, International Workshop on Formal Ontology, Padova, Italy, 1993. Technical report KSL-93-04, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University. [ 21] Gruninger, M. , Lee, Jintae. , Ontology Design and Applications, Communications of the ACM, February 2002, 45 (2), 1-2, 2002. [22 ] C. Wille, A. Abran, J-M Desharnais, R. Dumke, The Quality concepts and sub con
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Benchmarking Six Sigma Itil Ctq Csi