Performance Evaluation of Virtual Environment with Respect to Physical Environment
|
10.5120/15676-4425 |
Pooja Kedia and Renuka Nagpal. Article: Performance Evaluation of Virtual Environment with Respect to Physical Environment. International Journal of Computer Applications 89(11):17-22, March 2014. Full text available. BibTeX
@article{key:article,
author = {Pooja Kedia and Renuka Nagpal},
title = {Article: Performance Evaluation of Virtual Environment with Respect to Physical Environment},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Applications},
year = {2014},
volume = {89},
number = {11},
pages = {17-22},
month = {March},
note = {Full text available}
}
Abstract
Virtualization is the most emerging topic of this decade that has transformed the way the IT infrastructure is deployed. Virtualization is capturing the IT industry and replacing the physical environment with the virtual one. Thus, before switching to virtualization it is very essential for an organization to evaluate the performance of the virtual environment. In this paper, the performance of virtual and physical environment is evaluated. Two types of hypervisors i. e. VMWare ESXi 5 and Hyper V Windows Server 2012 are used in order to create the virtual environment. The performance of the two hypervisors used to create the virtual environment is also compared and evaluated. The performance evaluation is done with the help of benchmarking tools.
References
- Pooja Kedia, Renuka Nagpal, Tejinder Pal Singh, A Survey on Virtualization Service Providers, Security Issues, Tools and Future Trends, IJCA, May 2013.
- Sean Campbell and Michael Jeronimo, , An Introduction toVirtualization, 2006
- Barham, P. , Dragovic, B. , Fraser, K. , Hand, S. , Harris, T. , Ho, A. , Neugebauer,R. , Pratt, I. , Warfield, A. , Xen and the art of virtualization. Proceedings of the19th ACM symposium on Operating systems principles. ACM Press. , pp. 164-177, 2005.
- Devanathan Nandhagopal, Nithin Mohan, Saimanoj kumaar Ravichandran, Shilp Malpani, VMware and Xen Hypervisor Performance Comparisons in Thick and Thin Provisioned Environments, 2012
- Muditha Perera, P. Keppitiyagama, Chamath, A performance comparison of hypervisors , 2012, IEEE
- Daniel A. Menasce, Virgilio A. F. Almeida, Capacity Planning for Web Services: Metrics, Models, and Methods, 200,1 Prentice Hall
- Passmark performance test, http://www. passmark. com/products/pt. htm
- Iometer, Iometer User's Guide,2003
- Anuj Sehgal, Jürgen Schönwälder, Testing Network Performance with Iperf, 2010
- P. Calduwel Newton, L. Arockiam, A Quality of Service Algorithm to Reduce Jitter in Mobile Networks, 2011, Springer